About Eduwonk & ES Media

About Eduwonk
ES Blog Editorial Policy
Education Sector
The Education Sector Digest
The Quick and the Ed

News Feeds & More

ATOM
RSS

Archives

Reviews of Eduwonk.com

2007 Winner, Editor's Choice Best Education Blog
-- Performancing.com

2006 Winner, Best K-12 Administration Blog -- "Best of the Education Blog Awards"
-- eSchool News and Discovery Education

2006 Finalist, Best Education Blog
-- Weblog Awards

Least influential of education's most influential information sources.
-- Education Week Research Center

"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity... they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Slate's Mickey Kaus

"a very smart blog... [if] you're trying to separate the demagogic attacks on NCLB from the serious criticism, this is the site to read"
-- The New Republic's Ryan Lizza

"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Hechinger Institute on Education and the Media's Richard Colvin

"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post

"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash of humor"
-- Education Week

"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily

"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly

"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education

"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts

"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin, AFT Blog

"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams, fallen journalist, Executive Director, Democrats for Education Reform

"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation

"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress, former education advisor to President Bush and former chairman, Dallas Board of Education

"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner, champion letter-to-the-editor writer and retired teacher

"thugs"
-- Susan Ohanian

Education News and Analysis

American Educator
Chronicle of Higher Education
EducationNews.org
Education Next
Education Week
eSchool News
Inside Higher Ed
Jay Mathews' Class Struggle
Phi Delta Kappan
New York Times Education
School Wise Press
Stateline.org
Teacher Magazine

Policy and Political Blogs

The American Scene
Andrew Sullivan.com
Bloggingheads
Booker Rising
The Corner
Daniel Drezner
Dangerous Thoughts
The Democratic Strategist
Foresight
The Has Been
Huffington Post
Instapundit.com
Kausfiles.com
Loose Cannon
Matthew Yglesias
Mojo
Oxblog
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal (Washington Monthly)
The Politico
Post Global
Real Clear Politics
Scotusblog
Taking Note
Talkingpointsmemo.com
Tank'd
Tapped
Think Tank Town
Volokh Conspiracy
WSJ's Blog Federation
Washington Whispers

EduReading


Collective Bargaining in Education: Negotiating Change in Today's Schools

Edited by Jane Hannaway and Andrew J. Rotherham


Why Newsweek's List of America's 100 Best High Schools Doesn't Make the Grade

By Andrew J. Rotherham
and Sara Mead

A Qualified Teacher
in Every Classroom

Edited by Frederick M. Hess, Andrew J. Rotherham,
and Kate Walsh

America's Teaching Crisis

By Jason Kamras and Andrew J. Rotherham

Rethinking Special Education For A New Century

Edited by Chester E. Finn, Jr., Andrew J. Rotherham
& Charles R. Hokanson, Jr.

Making The Cut: How States Set Passing Scores on Standardized Tests

By Andrew J. Rotherham

Education Blogs

A Constrained Vision
Andrew Pass
a schoolyard blog
ASCD
Assorted Stuff
Mr. B-G's English Blog
Barnett Berry
Bill Jackson's Education Blog
Bridging Differences (Meier and Ravitch)
Bulletin Board (NASBE)
Campaign K-12 (Ed Week)
Chaos Theory
Charter Blog (NAPCS)
Charter School Policy Inst. Blog
Chez Dormont
Chris Correa
Class Context
The College Puzzle
College Ready Blog (Athens Learning Group)
The Common School
Conversation Starters
Core Knowledge Blog
Critical Mass
Dangerously Irrelevant
Daryl Cobranchi
Dave Shearon
Dave Saba (ABCTE)
DC Education Blog
D-EDreckoning
Dems for Education Reform
The Deputy Head
Early Ed Watch
Early Stories
edbizbuzz
EdPol
Edspresso
Educated Nation
Educating One Mind
The Education Network
The Education Wonks
EduFlack
Eduoptimists
EdWahoo
Eduwonkette
Edwize (UFT)
Eponymous Educator
Essential Blog
Extra Credit
Flypaper (Fordham)
Fordham Fellows
From The Trenches
The Gadfly
Get On The Bus (Dayton Daily News)
Get Schooled (AJC)
The Gradebook (St. Pete Times)
Grumpy Professor
The Hall Monitor
Higher Ed Watch
Hip Teacher
I Thought A Think
IALA
In Other News (Ed Week)
Inside Pre-K
Instructivist
Intercepts
IvyGate
Jay Greene
Jenny D.
Joannejacobs.com
John Merrow
K-12 Hotlinks
Kindling Flames
Kitchen Table Math
Learning Now (PBS)
The Life That Chose Me
Mathew K. Tabor
Media Infusion
Ms. Frizzle
Moving At The Speed Of Creativity
NCLB Act II (Ed Week)
NCLBlog (AFT)
Newoldschoolteacher
NSBA's BoardBuzz
NYC Educator
Paper Trail (USN)
ParaNews (NCP)
Parentalcation
Paul Baker
Pedablogue
The Portable Princess
The PrincipalsPage
Principal's Policy Blog (NASSP)
Quasi Dictum
Roy Romer
Running on Empty
School of Blog
School Zone (MJS)
Schools for Tomorrow
Science After School
SF Schools
Sherman Dorn
SITE Mentor
Small Talk
Special Education Law Blog
Starting Over (Ed Week)
Swift & Change Able
Teach and Learn
Teacher Voices
Teachers At Risk
Teachers' Lounge
Teaching in the 408
Teaching Rookie
Think Lab
This is how I Swim
This Week In Education
Tim Fredrick
Up The Down Staircase
Urban Angle
VARC
What up, Mz. Smlph?
Whitney Tilson
Why Boys Fail
Why Homeschool

Educational Resources and Organizations

AALE Charter School Accreditation
Achieve
Alliance for Excellent Education
American Association of School Administrators
American Educational Research Association
American Federation of Teachers
American Institutes For Research
Annie E. Casey Foundation
Aspen Institute
Asia Society
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
The Broad Foundation
The Brookings Institution
Building Excellent Schools
Center for American Progress
Center for Education Reform
Center for School Change
Center on Education Policy
Center on Reinventing Public Education
Citizens Commission On Civil Rights
Coalition of Essential Schools
Community College Research Center
Community Training and Assistance Center
Council of Chief State School Officers
Council of Great City Schools
Core Knowledge Foundation
Data Quality Campaign
Democratic Leadership Council
eSchool News
EducationBug
Education Commission of the States
Education Evolving
Education Sector
EdSource
The Education Trust
George Lucas Educational Foundation
Greatschools.net
Haberman Foundation
Hechinger Institute On Education and the Media
IssueLab
Joyce Foundation
Just for the Kids
Knowledge Alliance
Learning Point Associates
Local School Directory
Michael and Susan Dell Foundation
Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning
The Mind Trust
Montessori
National Academies Center for Education
National Alliance for Public Charter Schools
National Association of Charter School Authorizers
National Association of Secondary School Principals
NCLBWorks
National Center for Postsecondary Research
National Center on Education and the Economy
National Charter School Research Project
NCTAF
National Council on Teacher Quality
National Education Association
National Education Writers Association
National Governors Association
National Institute for Excellence in Teaching
National School Boards Association
New Leaders for New Schools
New Schools Venture Fund
The New Teacher Project
New Vision
Pre-K Now
Harvard's Program On Education Policy and Governance
Progressive Policy Institute
PPI's 21st Century Schools Project
Public Agenda
Public Impact
Reading Reform Foundation
Rick Hess' World HQ
The Savvy Source for Parents
Scholastic Administrator
School Data Direct
Standard & Poor's School Evaluation Services
Standards Work
Teach for America
The Teaching Commission
Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
Trust for Early Education
Uncommon Schools
United States Department of Education
The Urban Institute
WestEd

Opinions on Eduwonk reflect the views of the author, Education Sector does not take institutional positions. Outgoing links do not constitute an endorsement.

Friday, September 29, 2006

Be Careful What You Wish For?

Per the item below, Republicans want these laws because the teachers' unions disproportionately help Democrats (90+ percent of their political giving as a rule). But, the Republicans (and many Democrats) also think the teachers' unions are an obstacle to improving schools. The teachers' unions obviously won't want to lose this dues money/political influence. So isn't one possible outcome here that the result of this litigation and subsequent legislation is that they spread the cash around more in order to assuage their membership -- which is not nearly as divided along stark partisan lines -- and consequently become more not less powerful as they bring more Republicans into their fold? Just a theory...
Posted at 1:57 PM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

One To Watch...And What's In A Name?
Here's why the addition of Roberts and Alito to the Supreme Court matters, lower profile but far reaching cases like this public employee union dues issue (Ed Week$ here) that could really clobber the teachers' unions. At issue is basically whether a positive check-off --meaning members have to affirmatively approve it not just file papers saying no -- for dues money being used for political purposes can be required by state law. The SCOTUS taking the case is not a good sign for the teachers' unions nor is the court's current line-up. Obvious backdrop should the court uphold the Washington State law: How many state legislative chambers are controlled by Republicans now. In the same vein, if the court upholds the WA law, look for a national campaign around some snazzy "death tax" sounding phrase to pass WA-style laws.
Posted at 1:26 PM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

Black People Want Good Public Schools, Too, Part 393832
Gosh, this stuff keeps happening and we keep hearing from the powers that be how it's no big deal, anomalous, etc...fact is sooner or later Democrats must have something to say about education reform and school choice besides (a) no (b) more of the same or (c) nothing to see here. And South Carolina is especially interesting since there is an important Democratic primary down there in '08...This really is not so complicated though. If Republicans champion choice and Democrats champion choice, accountability, and policies that truly empower parents with good options, seems like the Democrats win...And do not forget that for Republicans to win in many places they don't need to win a majority of African-Americans, just to raise their percentage of the vote. Over at the Charter Blog Justin weighs-in on this, too.
Posted at 11:54 AM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

Don't Forget To Vote
This blog asked me to publicize their un-pc contest. Instead I'll skew it. I will start to believe that electronic voting is unreliable if director and English prof. Tamsen Wolff doesn't win this election.
Posted at 11:38 AM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

Sinners In The Hands of An Angry Education Secretary
Couple of quick takeaways from Sam Dillon's NYT Bush on Bush piece about school accountability this week. First, there is a lot to recommend FL's system but if you're concerned about getting kids to standards as a school accountability system it still leaves open the possibility for kids to move through the system without getting there. Second, most states still can't do what Florida does, the article should have engaged with that issue because implicitly it feeds this simplistic notion that the changes to the law are so obvious and people like Rep. George Miller so out of touch. Third, great new attack on NCLB from Jeb Bush with an appeal to religion:

“I mean perfection is not going to happen,” Mr. Bush said Sept. 12 at a news conference in Orlando, arguing that achievement targets are important but that unrealistic ones discourage educators. “We’re all imperfect under God’s watchful eye, and it’s impossible to achieve it."

Read the Peterson-West analysis that the article is pegged to here.
Posted at 10:55 AM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

More CT Fizzle
That anti-No Child Left Behind lawsuit in Connecticut is on its last legs...the bottom fell out politically when the NAACP and other civil rights groups jumped-in on behalf of the Bush Administration and now the bottom is falling out legally as well. So just to recap, despite media hysterics, to date no state has pulled out of No Child and the lawsuits have amounted to nothing...
Posted at 10:51 AM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

More PhonicsGate...Petrilli Attacks!
Look for more news stories soon, who knew what/when kind of stuff. Secretary Spellings had better hope there is not a paper/email trail because the Houston Mafia is really pissed-off about all this. Mike Petrilli, who protests that he's not a made man in that crowd, publishes his widely circulated op-ed at National Review putting it on the Secretary...he'd better have an email/paper trail because these are some serious charges:

As the president’s first-term domestic-policy adviser, she micromanaged the implementation of Reading First from her West Wing office. She put one of her most trusted friends inside the Department of Education to make sure Doherty and his colleagues didn’t go soft and allow just any reading program to receive funds. She was the leading cheerleader for an aggressive approach. And now she bobs and weaves: “Although these events occurred before I became secretary of education, I am concerned about these actions and committed to addressing and resolving them.” (Regrettably, much of the media bought this spin — hook, line, and sinker. See here, for instance.) Shame on Spellings for not backing a loyal, selfless, and truly capable lieutenant...

Since someone is saying something here that is falsifiable look for some press attention...

Update: Sen. Harkin attacks, too! And he likes Mike! This will get messy if it gets tied up in the appropriations process.
Posted at 10:27 AM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

NTP Does Some Californication...And I Can’t Don Pajamas All Day
Skip these first two grafs if all you seek is content. Funny thing about this blog is that I not only get whacked for sins of commission, things I write, but also for sins of omission, things I don’t! I get a lot of emails to the effect of, “why haven’t you written about x or y? You can’t possibly support/oppose it can you? Jerk!” Or, as one reader wrote the the other day: “Swamped? Light posting? You live to serve this ship!”

Believe me, if I could make a living blogging, I would and then I'd blog much more! Exercise those ‘ol First Amendment rights, the hours are great, you work in your pajamas, the groupies are fantastic (a cross between Almost Famous and Good Will Hunting), I can’t buy a meal, and you don’t even have to write complete sentences or use proper grammar…what’s not to like? It’s a dream job. But it doesn't pay the bills so other things intrude.

That's a long way of saying that it’s only because I’ve been busy that I haven’t written about the recent bill in California which has important substantive and political implications and was a big win for that merry band of contrarian redistributive rebels known as The New Teacher Project.

Recall the NTP report, Unintended Consequences. It was not think tanky noise. Rather, it caught the attention of some California legislators, most notably California State Senator Jack Scott. He asked for more analysis from NTP about how various teacher assignment rules played out in some CA urban districts. Turned out the answer was: Much the same way as NTP showed in their report.

So, he introduced a bill to allow principals at school that CA has identified as “low performing” to choose which if any at all, teachers voluntarily transfer into their schools. Yes, I know, really radical stuff, there goes labor movement! It's Shirtwaist all over again...Anyway, the bill passed, more on that below. Basically, it allows low-performing schools to recruit early and have additional control over staffing. The bill continues some transfer rights and preferences for veteran teachers, but requires that schools be able to consider new teacher applicants and transfers equally after April 15 and ultimately hire the person they consider best for the job.

On the politics, the very powerful CTA strongly opposed the bill but it passed out of Assembly and Senate committees unanimously and out of the legislature by lopsided margins. In other words, very bipartisan. That’s really significant. Basically a civil rights/reform coalition won a not insignificant victory on an important issue. Winds of change, perhaps.

This also seems a slice of a simple and elegant idea put forward a decade ago by Lee Jenkins, then a superintendent in Northern California. Why, Jenkins asked, don’t we give really low-performing schools a lot of flexibility to do things differently including waiving a lot of process oriented regulations with an eye toward relentless effort to improve outcomes for kids. In other words, don’t handcuff struggling schools. Obviously, it takes more than that and just removing regulations is no cure by itself, but it’s not a bad framework for thinking about this and raises some interesting and fun questions for what policies around that should look like.
Posted at 9:48 AM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

Tuesday, September 26, 2006

Beating The [Expletive Deleted] Out Of Phonicsgate

Per this post on this Reading First fiasco, a couple more points from big to smaller:

First, it's a shame that this is being seen as a proxy referendum on the issue of reading research. There was at last a bipartisan consensus around some key points and this IG report (pdf) is allowing and emboldening the flat-earthers to again assert themselves as having research evidence on their side. In fact, that's the irony here. The Bush Administration had a very strong hand to play in terms of ensuring that this funding only supported programs with a solid grounding in methodologically rigorous research, yet they overplayed that hand. And in doing so they likely hurt the very issue they wanted to help by reigniting the debate about reading research.

Second, yes, Chris Doherty is being unfairly thrown over the side as the fall guy.* The idea that his actions were unsanctioned or that he was a lone evil genius is absurd. More than a year ago, Eduwonk said, think Seinfeld...well...Hello Neuman....a lot of the Houston folks pointing at her and there are a lot of chefs in this kitchen besides Doherty. Still, mistakes were made, as they say.

Third, and related, how long can Education Secretary Margaret Spellings get away with this strategy of feigning ignorance about anything that happened pre-2004? It's not like she wasn't in government, or in an influential position no less, during that time.

Fourth, while some of the stuff in the IG report isn't really all that damning, the defense being mounted by the Houston-mafia via an op-ed that is unpublished but has widely made the rounds among policy and media types, essentially arguing that results not process should matter, is pretty weak. We are ultimately a nation of laws and while burdensome procedures should be changed, federal officials don't get a pass on ones they don't like. That's a lesson this administration has had a really hard time learning...

Fifth, everyone is looking for a money scandal pay-to-play just conflict of interest. I doubt there is too much there though. I think this was more about ideology than anything else.

*And that is setting off a new and intense round of the fight between the Houston (Paige) and Austin (Spellings) folks.
Posted at 4:00 PM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

It's Not Sweeps Week
That's because I'm on Washington Post radio today from 1 or so until 2 with Jay Mathews talking about ed policy issues, what it's like to be on a state board of education, and why I prefer living in the country...Edge of your seat stuff! DC area it's 107.7 or 1500 or you can listen online.
Posted at 11:52 AM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

The Noise Knows!
Also on national standards/testing, per this post below, consistently cranky Russo and his sidekick pick up on the “think tanky noise” meme. It’s actually interesting and worth thinking about. Obviously, I don’t think everything that comes out of think tanks is noise, it’s how I earn my living, but in assessing the probabilities of action on an issue in terms of noise versus signal, you’ve got to look at it through a political lens.

I’d break the noise down into two categories. The first covers issues that might not yet be on the policy agenda, but are really plausible candidates for action. A great example of this was the various policy proposals that ultimately became No Child Left Behind. There was a lot of noise in the late 1990s about it from a variety of think tanks and advocacy groups – right and left – but there was also a reasonably clear path for the issue, and a coalition supporting it, to emerge on the agenda in a big way. In fact, the roles are now reversed and the people who had the power prior to NCLB have been divested and this motley coalition of players now has leverage over the policymaking agenda.

Contrast the No Child example with today’s national standards debate. What is the plausible coalition here? You can start with basically the centrist coalition that was willing to support Clinton’s 1996 push for national testing in just two grades. That coalition proved insufficient and contrary to today’s CW, I’m not sure NCLB has broadened support for nationalizing some of these policies so much as made it harder because of all the attendant NCLB politics. The debate is basically about whether or not to roll back NCLB, not expand it! What’s more, there are people like me who are not opposed to national standards in some subjects but would not support imposing the NAEP or any other federal test as the way to do it right now. Add in various other concerns about quality, cost, etc…and you get the picture. It's a relatively small band whose passion outweighs its numbers. Fordham is right that there are ways through this but they’re all tortured to some extent and the big coalition, or even its potential political leaders, have not emerged.

The “if you build it they will come” approach to talking about an issue long enough and hard enough that it becomes an issue on the policy agenda only gets you so far. Some key players have to want to play baseball in the first place. For a great book about these dynamics, hard to beat this one.
Posted at 11:36 AM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

National Testing...And Aspen Radicals?
At yesterday's Aspen NCLB Commission hearing pretty much everyone was tripping over themselves to tout the virtues of a national test/standards...pretty much everyone that is but the one Bush Administration person -- Dep. Sec. Ray Simon -- who testified. Meanwhile Rep. Miller and Rep. McKeon say it's DOA on their end of Pennsylvania Avenue. Can't see the Senate Republicans taking it on either. So it falls to Senator Kennedy...But still, nobody who has their paycheck signed by Uncle Sam has signed onto this...

Perhaps the opposition from conservatives will ignite Kennedy's contrarian streak but it seems to me that conservative grumbling makes it even less likely this will catch fire. So for now the more interesting policy issue seems to me to be how to mitigate the "race to the bottom" risks within the current NCLB framework.

Also, the conventional wisdom is very firmly that the Aspen Commission will make no major recommendations for changes to NCLB. Consequently, look for radical proposals in their final report...
Posted at 11:02 AM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

Those Boots Are Walkin'
Parents fight back in Memphis...And, from LA, turns out that Jefferson High School only has about 350 kids in its freshman class while the new Green Dot schools have about 750...that's not sustainable for Jefferson over time. Backstory on all that here. So, faced with declining market share attack the consumers. Good strategery!
Posted at 10:51 AM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post