About Eduwonk & ES Media

About Eduwonk
ES Blog Editorial Policy
Education Sector
The Education Sector Digest
The Quick and the Ed

News Feeds & More



Reviews of Eduwonk.com

2007 Winner, Editor's Choice Best Education Blog
-- Performancing.com

2006 Winner, Best K-12 Administration Blog -- "Best of the Education Blog Awards"
-- eSchool News and Discovery Education

2006 Finalist, Best Education Blog
-- Weblog Awards

Least influential of education's most influential information sources.
-- Education Week Research Center

"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity... they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Slate's Mickey Kaus

"a very smart blog... [if] you're trying to separate the demagogic attacks on NCLB from the serious criticism, this is the site to read"
-- The New Republic's Ryan Lizza

"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Hechinger Institute on Education and the Media's Richard Colvin

"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post

"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash of humor"
-- Education Week

"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily

"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly

"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education

"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts

"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin, AFT Blog

"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams, fallen journalist, Executive Director, Democrats for Education Reform

"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation

"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress, former education advisor to President Bush and former chairman, Dallas Board of Education

"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner, champion letter-to-the-editor writer and retired teacher

-- Susan Ohanian

Education News and Analysis

American Educator
Chronicle of Higher Education
Education Next
Education Week
eSchool News
Inside Higher Ed
Jay Mathews' Class Struggle
Phi Delta Kappan
New York Times Education
School Wise Press
Teacher Magazine

Policy and Political Blogs

The American Scene
Andrew Sullivan.com
Booker Rising
The Corner
Daniel Drezner
Dangerous Thoughts
The Democratic Strategist
The Has Been
Huffington Post
Loose Cannon
Matthew Yglesias
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal (Washington Monthly)
The Politico
Post Global
Real Clear Politics
Taking Note
Think Tank Town
Volokh Conspiracy
WSJ's Blog Federation
Washington Whispers


Collective Bargaining in Education: Negotiating Change in Today's Schools

Edited by Jane Hannaway and Andrew J. Rotherham

Why Newsweek's List of America's 100 Best High Schools Doesn't Make the Grade

By Andrew J. Rotherham
and Sara Mead

A Qualified Teacher
in Every Classroom

Edited by Frederick M. Hess, Andrew J. Rotherham,
and Kate Walsh

America's Teaching Crisis

By Jason Kamras and Andrew J. Rotherham

Rethinking Special Education For A New Century

Edited by Chester E. Finn, Jr., Andrew J. Rotherham
& Charles R. Hokanson, Jr.

Making The Cut: How States Set Passing Scores on Standardized Tests

By Andrew J. Rotherham

Education Blogs

A Constrained Vision
Andrew Pass
a schoolyard blog
Assorted Stuff
Mr. B-G's English Blog
Barnett Berry
Bill Jackson's Education Blog
Bridging Differences (Meier and Ravitch)
Bulletin Board (NASBE)
Campaign K-12 (Ed Week)
Chaos Theory
Charter Blog (NAPCS)
Charter School Policy Inst. Blog
Chez Dormont
Chris Correa
Class Context
The College Puzzle
College Ready Blog (Athens Learning Group)
The Common School
Conversation Starters
Core Knowledge Blog
Critical Mass
Dangerously Irrelevant
Daryl Cobranchi
Dave Shearon
Dave Saba (ABCTE)
DC Education Blog
Dems for Education Reform
The Deputy Head
Early Ed Watch
Early Stories
Educated Nation
Educating One Mind
The Education Network
The Education Wonks
Edwize (UFT)
Eponymous Educator
Essential Blog
Extra Credit
Flypaper (Fordham)
Fordham Fellows
From The Trenches
The Gadfly
Get On The Bus (Dayton Daily News)
Get Schooled (AJC)
The Gradebook (St. Pete Times)
Grumpy Professor
The Hall Monitor
Higher Ed Watch
Hip Teacher
I Thought A Think
In Other News (Ed Week)
Inside Pre-K
Jay Greene
Jenny D.
John Merrow
K-12 Hotlinks
Kindling Flames
Kitchen Table Math
Learning Now (PBS)
The Life That Chose Me
Mathew K. Tabor
Media Infusion
Ms. Frizzle
Moving At The Speed Of Creativity
NCLB Act II (Ed Week)
NSBA's BoardBuzz
NYC Educator
Paper Trail (USN)
ParaNews (NCP)
Paul Baker
The Portable Princess
The PrincipalsPage
Principal's Policy Blog (NASSP)
Quasi Dictum
Roy Romer
Running on Empty
School of Blog
School Zone (MJS)
Schools for Tomorrow
Science After School
SF Schools
Sherman Dorn
SITE Mentor
Small Talk
Special Education Law Blog
Starting Over (Ed Week)
Swift & Change Able
Teach and Learn
Teacher Voices
Teachers At Risk
Teachers' Lounge
Teaching in the 408
Teaching Rookie
Think Lab
This is how I Swim
This Week In Education
Tim Fredrick
Up The Down Staircase
Urban Angle
What up, Mz. Smlph?
Whitney Tilson
Why Boys Fail
Why Homeschool

Educational Resources and Organizations

AALE Charter School Accreditation
Alliance for Excellent Education
American Association of School Administrators
American Educational Research Association
American Federation of Teachers
American Institutes For Research
Annie E. Casey Foundation
Aspen Institute
Asia Society
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
The Broad Foundation
The Brookings Institution
Building Excellent Schools
Center for American Progress
Center for Education Reform
Center for School Change
Center on Education Policy
Center on Reinventing Public Education
Citizens Commission On Civil Rights
Coalition of Essential Schools
Community College Research Center
Community Training and Assistance Center
Council of Chief State School Officers
Council of Great City Schools
Core Knowledge Foundation
Data Quality Campaign
Democratic Leadership Council
eSchool News
Education Commission of the States
Education Evolving
Education Sector
The Education Trust
George Lucas Educational Foundation
Haberman Foundation
Hechinger Institute On Education and the Media
Joyce Foundation
Just for the Kids
Knowledge Alliance
Learning Point Associates
Local School Directory
Michael and Susan Dell Foundation
Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning
The Mind Trust
National Academies Center for Education
National Alliance for Public Charter Schools
National Association of Charter School Authorizers
National Association of Secondary School Principals
National Center for Postsecondary Research
National Center on Education and the Economy
National Charter School Research Project
National Council on Teacher Quality
National Education Association
National Education Writers Association
National Governors Association
National Institute for Excellence in Teaching
National School Boards Association
New Leaders for New Schools
New Schools Venture Fund
The New Teacher Project
New Vision
Pre-K Now
Harvard's Program On Education Policy and Governance
Progressive Policy Institute
PPI's 21st Century Schools Project
Public Agenda
Public Impact
Reading Reform Foundation
Rick Hess' World HQ
The Savvy Source for Parents
Scholastic Administrator
School Data Direct
Standard & Poor's School Evaluation Services
Standards Work
Teach for America
The Teaching Commission
Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
Trust for Early Education
Uncommon Schools
United States Department of Education
The Urban Institute

Opinions on Eduwonk reflect the views of the author, Education Sector does not take institutional positions. Outgoing links do not constitute an endorsement.

Friday, March 31, 2006

Burning A Hole In My Pocket...And, April Fools!

It's late Friday and I still have my $500...And be sure to check out the April Fools from Gadfly, always funny and quietly perceptive.
Posted at 5:01 PM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

Questioning Vouchers
Boardbuzz happily bathes in the warm glow from the top line finding from this St. Pete Times poll about school vouchers in Florida. Now I'm no fan of vouchers, but I do get tired of polls with poorly worded questions about them. The SPT asked respondents:

Some people say that state funds should only go to public schools. Others say the state of Florida should pay for private schooling if the public school a child attends is failing. In this situation would you be for or against giving state funds to private schools?

The problem is the sentiment captured in the final line: "giving state funds to private schools." Sure, that's part of the issue with vouchers but it's not a clean way to ask the question because it loads it. I haven't seen the entire poll so I don't know if they asked the question in multiple ways but I'd bet that if you asked it with an emphasis on parents being able to chose schools, even private schools with public money, you'd get a different result.

Now it may well be that Floridians oppose vouchers and are really serious about reforming their public schools, I'd like to think so, you just can't be sure from questions like this. And, to the extent that public school supporters take false comfort based on bad information, that's a problem. Incidentally, along these lines it's cold comfort that the SPT is happy that their poll jibes with the PDK poll, which has problems of its own.
Posted at 3:48 PM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

The Great, Or Actually Not-So-Great, Graduation Rate Debate
Now I know how all those suckers who pay good money to watch a heavyweight bout that ends in the first round feel...or perhaps more likely how you'd feel if you'd just watched George Foreman fight Little Orphan Annie.

For the past few months the head of the Economic Policy Institute, Lawrence Mishel, has been touting a graduation rate doomsday weapon that would discredit the existing consensus about grad rates and make everyone reconsider the issue. Regular readers will recall that last we heard from Monsieur Mishel he was hawking an EPI produced booklet purporting to objectively examine the whole AFT-charter school episode without disclosing that the AFT pays part of his salary. Teachers College Press got a little egg on their face for publishing it without disclosing the funding issue.

A week or two back Mishel finally took on graduation rate experts Jay Greene, Chris Swanson, Gary Orfield*, etc...in Ed Week. But the debate is embarrassingly one-sided, decide for yourself: Here's Mishel's salvo and here is a response from Greene, his colleague Greg Winters, and Chris Swanson, formerly of the Urban Institute now at Ed Week. Worth fully reading both. Perhaps the actual Mishel paper, which Greene, Winters, and Swanson say they could not get their hands on, will be more impressive and we'll revisit accordingly if that's the case (and for the record, I would love it if the grad rate numbers were better than we think).

Right now, the bottom line is that to buy what Mishel is selling this time you have to believe that all these folks, not just favorite ed establishment villain Greene (a) clumsily overlooked this "gold standard" of data that Mishel found (b) didn't understand it and/or (c) are all out to unfairly castigate the public schools.

The debate is more about data sets than methods: Mishel uses the Current Population Survey and National Education Longitudinal Study data while Greene, Swanson, etc...use Common Core of Data (CCD) from the Department of Education. A second is a subsidiary methods issue, Greene etc...make calculations based on the CCD using their own methodology (there are some differences between Greene's method and Swanson's method) while Mishel uses the reported results in these other datasets with some adjustments for GEDs. And, that's a third issue with this debate more generally: There is definition of terms confusion not only in terms of different ways of looking at the dropout issue but also about on-time graduation versus completion. The rates of high school completion one gets depend on whether GEDs are included, in other words students who don't finish in four years but do subsequently earn a degree. Again, read both Ed Week pieces, too much to excerpt here.

It's worth noting is that even though the Greene method, Swanson method (pdf), and John Robert Warren's method (pdf) vary, they all land roughly around the same numbers providing some convergent validity in terms making public policy (though there is a debate about the differences among them and other methods). Put another way, despite Mishel's apparent efforts to say there is less of a disaster going on than it might appear, there is a very serious dropout problem. As states develop better data systems to track students this methods debate will become less important though new issues will invariably arise. But for now these methods are the best at hand. That's one reason why the National Governor's Association adopted a compact (pdf) incorporating them. In other words, barring some new evidence at the 11th hour, this debate is largely over.

*Mishel (and the AFTies who predictably jumped all over this) conveniently forget to note that Harvard Civil Rights Project co-director Gary Orfield is right there with Greene, Swanson, et al...kinda makes you think this might be a little political...Orfield complicates the villainous conservatives out to ruin the public schools storyline too much. Funny side note: In their excitement the AFTies even confused Paul Peterson and Jay Greene (all those bad men look alike to us!).
Posted at 2:34 PM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

Thursday, March 30, 2006

Lionizing Ridiculousness

Via Williams at The Chalkboard who offers some NY context, will someone please get these guys some professional public relations help...stuff like this just kills the public schools...

Update: There is even more!
Posted at 5:23 PM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

Proud Pop
I think this is the first press release for our new little girls...and it's about teacher quality and civil rights no less...
Posted at 5:18 PM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

Take Money From This Man
Per the below, someone please take Sherman Dorn's money.
Posted at 9:01 AM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

Narrowing The Hysteria...It's "Somewhat" Out Of Hand
I'm even less blown away by this week's curriculum narrowing hysteria than I was when the NYT's story first ran on Sunday. The Center on Education Policy report is fine, in-line with their previous work, and is a useful source of No Child implementation data. The problem is, it's not as definitive as No Child Left Behind critics would like because it's (a) self-reported and (b) in this specific case not clearly reported at all and to the extent the data do point in a direction it's away from rampant cutting of other subjects to make room for math and reading. Worth noting, on the first issue that Russo says the Chicago case study is a mess.

On the latter, CEP tells us that "According to our surveys, 71% of districts reported that they had reduced time in at least one subject to expand time for reading and math in 2005-06." That's the data point, based on the findings for elementary schools, that landed in the top slot of the Sunday Times front page. I don't doubt that this is going on in some places (though it doesn't have to) but what we don't know are specifics like (a) exactly how much time is being cut, 10 minutes or 2 hours?, or (b) how much of this is attributable to NCLB, state policies, or even state and local budget issues being blamed on NCLB.

The CEP study doesn't help answer those questions, even really the time one, because when they drill down to examine time gradations in the survey CEP asks districts if they're cutting other subjects to make time for reading and math: (1) Somewhat/to a Great Extent (2) Not at All/Minimally (3) Don’t Know. Interesting way of measuring something as truly difficult to quantify as time. From a social science perspective, what the hell does "somewhat" mean anyway?

Now that notwithstanding, what the hysterics this week haven't told you is that even within this clumsy metric (which I think you can argue creates an upward bias) 64 percent of districts said they'd reduced social studies "minimally or not at all", 68 percent said the same thing about science, 76 percent about art and music, and 83 percent about physical education! In other words they couldn’t even say “somewhat.” That, says CEP, are the data on the great narrowing scare of 2006.

Russo basically says CEP is in the tank on this. Could be, CEP head Jack Jennings' quote in the Times was more gasoline than water on the storyline, but I'm not quite sure and will give them the benefit of the doubt. A good test will be the extent to which CEP lets this anti-NCLB brush fire they've fueled burn or tries to tamp it down. This "narrowing" finding has taken on a life of its own this week. Since making various monetary offers is apparently the order of the day, here's mine to sweeten the pot for CEP: I will donate $500 a charity of Jack Jennings' choice if CEP makes a high profile effort (widely circulated press release, open letter, etc...) to set the record straight.

Other related tidbits: (a) In the appendix CEP lists panelists at their NCLB forums. Word on the edustreet from reliable sources is that there was some back and forth with the civil rights crowd about the composition of at least one forum (b) here is NPR's "On Point" on the narrowing issue from Wednesday's show (c) I had thought the claim was that NCLB was unfairly labeling suburban schools as "needing improvement" when they were really good but just not doing well with one or two subgroups of kids...but now, apparently, it's that the law is unfair to urban schools...really hard to keep up with the talking points these days, you take a couple of days off and you're lost! But seriously, pace Willie Sutton, you would expect a law aimed at low-performing schools to touch a lot of urban schools, no?

Update: My colleague Tom Toch also makes an important point that we don't really know that these schools were so wonderfully rich before and it's a good bet that many were not.
Posted at 7:31 AM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

Wednesday, March 29, 2006

Big Love!

I'm Rick Hess Bi*ch and rising academic star Marty West apparently want jobs in a Romney Administration if this valentine Boston Globe op-ed is any indication. They praise the MA Governor and presidential aspirant Romney for having the temerity to challenge the teachers unions with some reform proposals...Right, what a really bold and risky move! The NEA and AFT leadership are just sitting around debating whether they'll go with Romney or Virginia Senator George Allen or maybe that nice Brownback fellow in '08...

Romney spoke today at an AEI event releasing this Hess - West paper (pdf) on teacher collective bargaining. For the most part it's a smart, sensible, and important paper (some of it is drawn from this book) and Hess and West are as sharp as they come in this business and neither is a knee-jerk conservative at all. Reforming teacher collective bargaining contracts is going to be a major issue in the next several years as the increasing attention to it indicates. But at a time when even some teachers' union leaders are acknowledging that reform is necessary it's going to be a shame if this turns into a partisan food fight. Can't blame Romney for taking on an issue with some payoff but unless some high profile Ds step-up this threatens to make the substantive debate harder.
Posted at 6:15 PM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

New Player, Good Players
One reason for cautious enthusiasm about the charter school sector is the high quality of various intermediate organizations that have sprung up around it. For instance, look for big things from this new organization in Texas, The Charter School Policy Institute. Why is this encouraging, you say? Because many of these organizations are principle driven not merely lowest-common denominator organizations fighting for their weakest member. In some states (eg CA, MI, NY, TX*) state charter organizations have supported closing low-performing charters, that’s not an ethic you see a lot of in education overall…

*To clarify, the resource center in TX, not the state assn.
Posted at 2:46 PM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

Carnival Of Ed Blogs
New Carnival of Education blogs is up here. Apparently they were picking on the AFTies at NCLBlog but I don't quite understand the issue.

Update: The Homies are having their carnival, too.
Posted at 2:45 PM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

Gender Benders
NY Sun's Gerstein reports on the fallout from the admission by Jennifer Delahunty Britz, of Kenyon College, about discrimination against girls in admissions.

Also, good debate in the USA Today today about single-sex public options for girls. USA Today ed board says bring 'em on, NOW's Kim Gandy says, no, it will lead to segregation. I just do not get the opposition from women's groups to this idea. and frankly think they're ill-serving the people they purport to represent by seeking to deny them a choice. No one is proposing mandatory single-sex education, which I would oppose. These are voluntary programs in the public sector.

If public schools offer single-sex options and parents choose them isn't that a good way to increase choices and customization in public education rather than force parents who want something different to go to the private sector for it? And, to date the single-sex charter schools are promising. There is bipartisan support for the idea, Senator Clinton and Senator Hutchison have been leaders on it, for instance.

The cynic student of interest groups in me also can't help but note that this is another one of these cases where things we're OK with in higher education (or pre-K education) cause people to go bonkers when we talk about them for K-12...That vague and harmless don't do this reform, "let's offer those benefits to all students" line at the end of the Gandy op-ed sounds eerily familiar…sure, let's offer them to all students but that's not exclusive of giving parents and students more choices in the public sector, too!
Posted at 12:41 PM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

Emigrating Republicans
With this immigration debate President Bush again finds himself closer to Senator Kennedy than the base of the Republican party. Thing is, while last time -- on No Child Left Behind -- the Republicans grudgingly went along because Bush was riding high, now he's not looking like such a good bet for them. Tom DeLay post-No Child from this article:

Rep. Tom DeLay (R-Texas) confessed to Rush Limbaugh that he "voted for that awful education bill" only to support President Bush. "I came here to eliminate the Department of Education so it was very hard for me to vote for something that expands [it]."

Hard to see that happening again...
Posted at 12:34 PM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

An email box full of good tips after a few days away, here are a few:

As I've said, you should read the AFT's American Educator, one of the best edupubs out there. The new issue focuses on content rich curricula for the early grades with a feature article by E.D. Hirsch.

At the eSchoolNews - Discovery Learning meeting they had a panel on edublogs featuring the winners of their 2006 blog awards. I was otherwise engaged but Sara Mead, who was there for the birth of Eduwonk, attended.

Wow. Perhaps I was wrong about national standards; if they're ready for them in SC then they'll sell anywhere.

School choice advocate Mathew Ladner wants to buy you a steak with all the trimmings:

The first person in the nation who can send me two random assignment school-choice studies showing significant declines in either academic performance or parental satisfaction will win a steak dinner. I'll even throw in drinks and dessert — the whole nine yards. You have one month to send the studies to Mladner@goldwaterinstitute.org. Feel free to forward this to your anti-school-choice friends and invite them to play. The more the merrier.

NACSA reports that "Forty-four applicant groups have applied to run charter schools in New Orleans as part of the redevelopment of the storm-ravaged city."

Interesting Aspen Institute - Annenberg report on Boston (pdf), what's happened, what's important during the leadership transition there.
Posted at 11:21 AM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

Tuesday, March 28, 2006

Oh Baby

Thanks to all the different blogs that posted nice notes about the birth of our girls, much appreciated.

Many personally profound takeaways from the experience but one wonky one, too. The hospital we used is the only one in the area that takes all comers so the post-partum program is strong and geared toward mothers who might not follow-up on good post-natal care for their children. Reaffirmed for me that governors who are working to create better policies in this area, home visits, education, etc...are really onto a good idea that will reap savings and improve the quality of life for a lot of kids down the road.
Posted at 12:29 PM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

New In Newark?
Boardbuzz will really have their hands full now! Cory Booker, a promising up-and-coming Democratic pol who happens to strongly support school vouchers now has the inside track to become the next mayor of Newark, NJ. The incumbent, Sharpe James, has decided to step aside. Big generational implications and educational ones, too. Booker is emblematic of a new class of urban pols and he'll be a national leader on the school choice issue.
Posted at 12:17 PM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

Exit, Given Voice
Good debate/discussion about high school exit exams from NPR's Talk of the Nation last week.
Posted at 9:53 AM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post

Monday, March 27, 2006

Was It Over When The Germans Bombed Pearl Harbor?

Big Sunday NYT front page splash about the pressure that No Child Left Behind's emphasis on reading and math is putting on other subjects like history, social studies, music, etc...Everyone not riveted by George Mason was chattering about it. Couple of thoughts:

First, the survey that the piece advanced is the most useful piece of work the Center on Education Policy does. It's a lot of data on NCLB implementation that no one else has. But, it's not bulletproof and the story didn't get into the details of it.

Second, reading (and math) is fundamental, as they say. How exactly are students supposed to engage with other subjects if they're not reading well? Though they vary by state, overall state tests are not wildly unrealistic in what they measure.

Third, there are plenty of schools that are doing a great job with the basics but also provide an engaging and rich place for kids. In fact, though stories like this are often cheered by folks who don't like standards, they do teachers no favors. America's teachers can walk and chew gum and the mantra that we can't teach all this stuff erodes respect for them. There is something of a false choice here and some examples of schools doing both might have been good context for readers.

Fourth, there is an issue of time here, both how much and how it's used. Some students will need more time on these subjects and that requires fresh thinking about the school day and year. In terms of how it's used, it's worth mentioning again that if you're not doing a good job teaching math or reading for x hours a day, there is no guarantee that x + y will get you there either. This is where using data to evaluate and inform instruction is key. More is not necessarily better.
Posted at 1:52 PM | Comments: 0 | Link to this item | Email this post