"Least influential of education's most influential information sources."
-- Education Week Research Center
"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash of humor"
-- Education Week
"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity... they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Mickey Kaus
"a very smart blog... this is the site to read"
-- Ryan Lizza
"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Richard Colvin
"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily
"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly
"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education
"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts
"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin
"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams
"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress
"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner
"Fabulous"
-- Education Week's Alyson Klein
"thugs"
-- Susan Ohanian
Smart List: 60 People Shaping the Future of K-12 Education
As is usual, Mr. Rotherham misses the point. Whether it is deliberate or not doesn’t matter.
The sole complaint Mr. Rotherham has about the Times story is their description of Stand For Children. The more important point is the framing of the opt-out issue, one that Mr Rotherham dismissed over at US News and World Report in the manner of Arne Duncan’s classist and sexist dismissal of Common Core critics last year.
For NYT (and Mr. Rotherham and his coterie) it is important to turn the opt -out into an attack on teacher unions.
For a view of opt-out that is closer to the ground, and thus more based in reality, read here:
State tests making rebels of parents
NY: Opt Out More Popular Than Charter Schools
The number of students opting out of the Big Standardized Test in New York State is still fluid, and we’ll have more numbers shortly when this week’s BS Test in mat inspires families to keep children out of the test-taking mess.
But a fair middle-of-the-road estimate would seem to be 175,000 students who chose not to take the BS Test.
175,000.
On a whim, I went looking for the number of charter school students in New York State. I found this number for the 2013-2014 school year in the report from the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools, a group that certainly has no reason to low-ball the number of charter students. Here’s the number.
91,813.
New York leaders like Andrew Cuomo and Merryl Tisch have been vocal in their support of vocals. Back when Bill DeBlasio was daring to stand in the way of charter expansion, Andrew Cuomo stood up at a charter rally to defend the charters and declare their importance to the state’s education.
Those 91,813 students were deemed worthy of being defended by the governor of the state:
“We are here today to tell you that we stand with you,” Mr. Cuomo said. “You are not alone. We will save charter schools.”
So my question is this: if 91,813 students deserve the full-throated defense of Governor Cuomo for their educational choices, then how soon can we expect him to stand up for the educational choices of the 175,000? If this week’s numbers hit the projection of 200,000, will he be twice as vocal in defense of twice as many students?