After this post showing people who teach children being treated like children, Silas Kulkarni of Student Achievement Partners reached out to discuss whether the Common Core might be good for teacher professional development. He made some interesting points, I asked for a guest post, and here it is:
“Repeat after me: ‘I will…think…critically.’” Sounds like a joke, unless you’ve watched this video (recently posted by this blog). In an image reminiscent of the satirical PD scene from The Wire, Season 4, teachers in a Chicago “PD” session are asked to parrot the presenter in unison. What might not be immediately apparent in the Chicago video is that the words that the teachers are repeating are taken from the Common Core State Standards. The irony is that the Common Core asks students to be critical thinkers, who can read complex texts, write analytically, and understand math both conceptually and fluently. Despite the fact that we are asking more of our students than ever before, rote and superficial methods of PD are still all too common for our teachers. Why?
First and foremost, old habits die hard. We are used to treating teachers more like factory workers than entrepreneurs. But there is a fundamental disjuncture between the idea of teachers as automatons and students as independent thinkers. Second, even those who understand this, struggle to make time for teachers to think, collaborate, and learn. To succeed with the Common Core, we need a new form of PD.
The hopeful news is that many teachers are already experiencing a better approach. Listen to these teachers from Washoe County (Reno, NV) talk about their teacher-driven PD initiative, known as the Core Task Project. The Core Task Project gives teachers the opportunity to pilot Common Core-aligned lesson plans with their students, reflect collaboratively on what worked (or didn’t), and receive feedback and training throughout the year. The initiative was recently featured in an EdWeek article and a Fordham Foundation report, and has grown from 18 teachers to nearly 1500 (roughly half the district). According to the Fordham report, 89% of the 1000 teachers surveyed reported that the PD helped deepen their understanding of the Common Core instructional shifts. Through their training, participating teachers have created a bank of Common Core-aligned curricular resources available freely via the web.
Around the country numerous strong professional learning models are springing up to meet the challenge of the Common Core, including LearnZillion’s TeachFest, New York City’s iPD initiative, the DC Common Core Collaborative, and the Basal Alignment Project (BAP). The Common Core did not create the demand for effective professional learning, but it does highlight how much we need it. In contrast to traditional PD, which often elicits groans and foot-dragging from teachers, teachers flock to real professional learning; LearnZillion had over 3000 applicants for its Dream Team and BAP has become one of the biggest Edmodo groups with over 35,000 members. Teachers are hungry for the opportunity to reflect on content, collaborate with peers, receive expert feedback, and practice the skills they are trying to learn. All of these models engage teachers deeply with the Common Core by asking them to think and create.
Thinking and creating are the practices we want to develop in our students. Why don’t we start by developing them in our teachers?
Silas Kulkarni works on the Literacy team at Student Achievement Partners, and previously taught in Harlem, New York, and SE Washington, DC.
Thanks Silas for illuminating the reality that if students are to engage in the rigorous work of the CCSS then teachers must also be given the opportunity (and time) to interrogate,understand and refine their own practice. Only through deeply considering the conceptual shifts of the Common Core and reflecting on the lessons learned through rich practice inside the classroom, will we teachers rise to be effective guides to our students as they navigate their own paths to success…
For the past 15 years, I have been a practitioner of the pd model “Lesson Study”. Lesson Study is teacher driven pd that is a perfect fit for studying the shifts in teaching and learning required by the common core standards. I just recently completed a cycle of lesson study where our focus was understanding the 8 standards of mathematical practice and developing lessons aligned to some of those standards. The lessons were taught live to students and observed by a group of invited “knowledgeable others”. Immediately following the lesson, the teachers and observers held a “post lesson discussion” to determine the effectiveness of the lesson and it’s alignment to the common core standards. By participating in cycles of Lesson Study teachers can decide which common core standards they would like to focus on and study them in depth. Over time, teachers can gain a thorough understanding of the common core standards while at the same time experiencing meaningful collaboration with colleagues and creating a bank of common core aligned lessons.