"Least influential of education's most influential information sources."
-- Education Week Research Center
"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash of humor"
-- Education Week
"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity... they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Mickey Kaus
"a very smart blog... this is the site to read"
-- Ryan Lizza
"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Richard Colvin
"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily
"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly
"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education
"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts
"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin
"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams
"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress
"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner
-- Education Week's Alyson Klein
-- Susan Ohanian
Smart List: 60 People Shaping the Future of K-12 Education
4 Replies to “Democrat v. Democrat”
The link above is bad. Here’s the piece: http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2014/02/26/de-blasio-charter-schools-education-common-core-column/5847593/
Success schools don’t accept any new students after the very first day of third grade. I’ll leave it to others to speculate what’s behind their high attrition rates, but their failure to serve children simply based on their age, and the assumption that they won’t test well, destroys Success’s argument that they ought to have free public space. If you want to deny access to so many kids “hungry for public school options” despite having available seats in classrooms, then you can pay for your own space (and hope everyone continues not to notice that you’re violating the state charter school law).
Non unionized schools are bad because they can’t launder campaign contributions thru ‘union dues’
Rotherman and Whitmire present a strong and compelling case against a straw man caricature of those opposing their corporate education reform ideas. At one point, I almost believed this was a serious article when they wrote “At the heart of this confrontation is a fundamental philosophical divide over what constitutes a common school.” But then they sum up those critical of Moskowitz and her Success Academy model by saying that “[her] critics believe in traditional school districts and unionized teachers.”
Her critics believe that education is a public good that deserves to be provided sufficient funds to do the job. Moskowitz and many other “successful” charters are able to get the results they get with piles of private money. Then, they take the “results” they achieved and compare it to schools that do not get those funds, causing more and more public schools to be shut down and further concentrating the most difficult children to educate in whatever remaining public schools exist.
“But parents should know a third: He’s waging a Democrat vs. Democrat battle over education issues that could spill into the 2016 Democratic presidential primary and into your community.”
Yeah, right. Wake me up from eternal slumber should education matter AT ALL in the 2016 elections.