Stand for Children and the Massachusetts Teachers Association struck a deal last week to head-off a ballot proposition on the November ballot. But some other unions in Mass are balking at the deal. Could get awkward for teachers union leaders, stay tuned.
Also from Massachusetts, Worcester Telegram looks at the deal and also force transfers there:
As Worcester school administrators scramble this month to honor some 200 requests from teachers seeking transfers to other assignments, they are dealing with a step that, while new to the sprawling school district, is commonplace in the private sector.
For the first time, transferring employees must sit down for interviews with their prospective bosses: principals.
It is a requirement that critics say should have long been an obvious part of the process, and it comes amid growing calls at the state and national levels for teacher accountability and more stringent methods of evaluating teachers’ effectiveness…
Ecstasy in Professional Education Reform Movement land:
RIP to Michael Winerip.
Mr. Winerip to leave the New York Times.
But not without a final parting shot (also known as just the facts, ma’am)
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/11/education/florida-backtracks-on-standardized-state-tests.html?_r=2&ref=us
As for Stand For Children, how do things stand in Illinois where the son of famed civil rights activists Marian Wright Edelman and Peter Edelman sought to emasculate teachers?
Why, 90% of teachers vote to give permission for the union to call a strike.
That’s more than 75%
Where will Jonah stand?
The establishment response in Chicago:
“At a time when our graduation rates and college enrollments are at record highs — two successes in which our teachers played an integral role — we cannot halt the momentum with a strike,”
Records highs?
Momentum?
Sounds like the 5 year agricultural plans of the Soviet Union.