"Least influential of education's most influential information sources."
-- Education Week Research Center
"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash of humor"
-- Education Week
"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity... they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Mickey Kaus
"a very smart blog... this is the site to read"
-- Ryan Lizza
"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Richard Colvin
"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily
"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly
"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education
"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts
"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin
"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams
"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress
"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner
-- Education Week's Alyson Klein
-- Susan Ohanian
Smart List: 60 People Shaping the Future of K-12 Education
5 Replies to “In The States”
As always, the best are the reader comments.
These deserve notice:
Maybe Mr. Rotherham can answer VARedskin fan, especially in light of his love of Washington sports.
To add to RedskinsFan’s comment, a large majority of those who quit within the first 5 years are not competent to be a public school teacher.
I am still waiting for someone to explain to me what the Washington bill means for me. None of the subjects i teach are measured through standarized testing. Does this mean we will now have to waste time and money creating tests for everything in our curriculum that is not tested? Or to those of who teach non tested subjects just get to ignore this stuff? In my mind, this is the elephant in the room that the so called reformers just completely ignore. I suspect they don’t have an answer. If you do have one, please share. I want to know.
More real talk from a math and physics instructor.
I despise edu-speak and eduwonk thought. It drive smart people nearly nuts. Half the time, I can never figure out what is being said. And when I try to pin these people down, they just back up and re-qualify their statements. This goes on, and on, and on, and on.
I will keep it very plain: The present reforms are far outstripping any of the weak research that has been done to justify changes to our school system. These changes are driven by an entirely unaccountable political system and network of think tanks, lobbying groups, and bloggers. Everyone is in charge, and thus no one is in charge.
What will be the impact on math and science at the high school level? No one knows. One thing is certain RIGHT NOW. The incentives are NOT THERE to attract the kind of talent we NEED RIGHT NOW to our m/s classrooms.
The pay will HAVE TO GO UP and the risk will HAVE TO GO DOWN. M/S teachers are not dummies. Far from it. They are rational. They respond to incentives. The present system is heavy on the risk side and VERY LOW on the reward side.
This is not a complaint. School districts are broke, if we are to believe the wonkers.
So, there is a real crisis. The talkers and policy wonks have chased away the talent they need with their reckless talk.
If you want the talent, you had better be prepared to TREAT THEM WELL. And that is entirely unacceptable to the school reform movement. So this country right now is standing still and going nowhere at warp speed.
A tiered pay system whereby math and science are paid DOUBLE what the weaker subjects are paid would move very quickly in the direction of attracting the kind of talent we need.
By any measure of opinion and data, we need stronger math and science instructors right now in our high schools. It means some tough choices will need to be made. It will mean some teachers in the electives either having their pay cut in half or being asked to leave. It will mean coaches and PE teaches earning a fraction of what they used to earn.
It well could mean m/s teachers being some of the highest paid employees in a district.
Now, let’s look at reality. It will never fly. It will never pass muster Why? Our society is painfully envious and egalitarian. We are NOT and never have been a meritocracy.
The only reason why the purely meritocratic system is being tried in the schools is because they are so insular. They are the PERFECT experimental lab for the burgeoning eduwonks and overstaffed think tanks our nation has produced. And if mistakes are made so that a generation of children is totally messed up in m/s then NOONE is held ACCOUNTABLE for the poor decision.
We are the world’s leading producer of opinions which the rest of the world could not care less about. How do we count these opinions for GDP anyway?
M/s teachers have the power to create the powers of innovation within a child. No other subject has that power. And right now we are doing our best to STAMP THEM OUT.
To you eduwonks, some of us studied worthy subject in college, that were difficult, and took us to another level. Most of you took easy stuff, and you know it. Is there a bit of envy and malice in your policies?
I watch you guys at my college. For the most part you are all a bunch of narcissistic trouble makers. I do not apologize for the blunt talk. The entire debate about edu-reform needs blunt talk from m/s instructors.
The entire edu-reform movement is BALONEY.