"Least influential of education's most influential information sources."
-- Education Week Research Center
"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash of humor"
-- Education Week
"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity... they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Mickey Kaus
"a very smart blog... this is the site to read"
-- Ryan Lizza
"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Richard Colvin
"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily
"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly
"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education
"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts
"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin
"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams
"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress
"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner
"Fabulous"
-- Education Week's Alyson Klein
"thugs"
-- Susan Ohanian
Smart List: 60 People Shaping the Future of K-12 Education
In their Richmond Times Dispatch letter, Ciolfi and Rotherham complain that Virginia is not addressing low achievement by student subgroups — minorities, low-income, LD. They also complain that Virginia students’ pass rates on Virginia’s state-developed standardized tests are much higher than Virginia students’ pass rates on nationally-developed standardized tests.
But, it’s not clear exactly what they want done to address these problems.
If they are advocating high-stakes-testing (that is, teachers discharged, schools closed based on test scores), then their proposed remedy will not cure the problem, might make it worse, and will have important adverse side effects — particularly the discharge of competent and even outstanding teachers who had the courage or misfortune to teach classes containing many “problem” students. Even the most complex value-added models do not compensate for the impact of non-teacher-controlled variables — particularly the disruption of classroom instruction by disruptive students — on a teacher’s student test scores.
If they are advocating for more detailed low-stakes-testing (that is, a breaking-down of student test scores by student subgroups and publicizing of these results to the community but without establishing specific consequences to the test scores), their position is much more reasonable. Low-stakes-testing allows teachers, school administrators, elected school boards, and concerned citizens to identify possible problems without irrationally attributing blame for those problems or enforcing possibly counter-productive solutions to those problems. Low-stakes-testing also minimizes the risk of adverse side effects — i.e., discharge of competent teachers, teaching to the test, curriculm narrowing, cheating, discouraging teachers from teaching in schools with many “problem” students. And, our long tradition of local control of education argues strongly against Richmond or Washington deciding what is causing problems in local schools or what solutions our local schools should adopt.
LaborLawyer: I agree with your conclusion that low-stakes testing (especially using locally devised solutions) is much better than high-stakes testing. High-stakes testing (where student results are tied to teacher dismissal) will simply result in additional problems, such as teaching to the test and/or teacher shying away from working in low-income schools, where they would be unfairly penalized.