"Least influential of education's most influential information sources."
-- Education Week Research Center
"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash of humor"
-- Education Week
"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity... they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Mickey Kaus
"a very smart blog... this is the site to read"
-- Ryan Lizza
"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Richard Colvin
"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily
"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly
"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education
"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts
"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin
"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams
"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress
"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner
-- Education Week's Alyson Klein
-- Susan Ohanian
Smart List: 60 People Shaping the Future of K-12 Education
2 Replies to “Formulas And Not Formula?”
I have been pointing out for some time now that the argument made in the Riddle brief posted above is based on excessively crude analyses (in this case, completely misleading anecdotes) which fail to consider the current insensitivity of poverty income thresholds to regional and urban-rural income/wage distributions. A similar argument is at the center of the supplemental poverty measure debate. Put simply, when one adjusts poverty rates for regional differences, one does not find that Title I is disproportionately allocated to rich states/districts:
We can take this analysis a step further to show that Title I also does not overfund urban areas and underfund rural areas. I will have more on this soon.
The NEA report is very impressive. Just might get me to join. The differential pay part alone is worth the price of reading the report. This does not seem to be business as usual and in the main, does not sell-out teachers to business model reformistas. Now I’m going to spend more time with it and read what others have to say.