"Least influential of education's most influential information sources."
-- Education Week Research Center
"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash of humor"
-- Education Week
"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity... they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Mickey Kaus
"a very smart blog... this is the site to read"
-- Ryan Lizza
"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Richard Colvin
"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily
"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly
"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education
"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts
"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin
"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams
"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress
"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner
-- Education Week's Alyson Klein
-- Susan Ohanian
Smart List: 60 People Shaping the Future of K-12 Education
7 Replies to “Not Tough Reading”
Two fantastic pieces that, for me, have already left an imprint.
Even better, is the article promoted on the sidebar:
No, Serious-No Excuses”
Having just had a son, it made me wonder about the extent to which I would want to expose him to a similar difficult situation. I simply don’t have the heart to go this far, but I think that in this era of “helicopter parenting”, this gives us a great idea of what is possible. In teaching students about test preparation, I notice how so many students aren’t accustomed to assignments and problems that ask them to really think. The head of the school could really give some educators here some good tips.
Here is a great idea.
Break math and science AWAY from public schools.
Set up separate magnet schools where interested students can go for a period or two a day.
Let the MS schools operate outside the restrictions and opinions of the ignorant ed. departments and the edu-experts.
We now have in this country an edu-industry. And it is just as bad for taxpayers as the military industrial complex.
The reform movement pays HUGE salaries, largely hidden from the public.
These carpet baggers move around the nation sucking down vast sums of district budgets with unproven claims and strategies.
Math and science teachers ARE COMPELLED TO INCORPORATE these failed methods in their classrooms.
And then they are HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE RESULTS.
The only solution is very simple: Competent teachers must break away and set up competing solutions that will suck the paychecks away from these experts.
Teachers must enter markets and offer their own educational products and reap those rewards.
Right now they are indentured servants, losing at least 3/4 of their productivity to an enormous bureaucracy that adds little or no value.
It is the only viable solution. Teachers must break away.
And that means NO UNION.
This blog is wonderful for administrators and edu-experts that are looking for the new chain of slogans to deliver at their next meeting with parents or the public.
Please read the article and then ask yourself this important question. Exactly WHAT did this guy say, and exactly how do I know it will work, and exactly what are the steps to improvement.
Geez, that at least is the MINIMUM for a math or physics course.
I’m surprised to hear that anyone would suggest that teaching students to be people of strong character is inimical or irrelevant to classroom success, or for that matter success beyond our classrooms.
The author’s main thesis appears to be that teachers and students can reliably evaluate character, that teachers can help students develop character traits, and that certain character traits are beneficial later in life.
Certainly, this article alone isn’t enough for a school or district to embark on a completely new way of classroom management or school-wide character education, let alone giving families a character report card, but I know that my students receive more from me than the content of my lessons, whether I want them to or not. At least with a focused way of thinking about the values that I want my students to learn from me, I might be able to model them in my instruction more effectively.