"Least influential of education's most influential information sources."
-- Education Week Research Center
"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash of humor"
-- Education Week
"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity... they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Mickey Kaus
"a very smart blog... this is the site to read"
-- Ryan Lizza
"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Richard Colvin
"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily
"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly
"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education
"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts
"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin
"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams
"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress
"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner
"Fabulous"
-- Education Week's Alyson Klein
"thugs"
-- Susan Ohanian
Smart List: 60 People Shaping the Future of K-12 Education
Actually I found from my many years of teaching that the cheating comes from above. The usual method is to tell the teachers that it’s OK to “familiarize yourself” with the test and “prepare the children.” After that the administrator often “helps” the teacher by preparing test materials that essentially have the same or nearly the same items as the real test. One assistant superintendent, a very nice man, actually told us that he had been to a testing conference and was told that it is OK to drill children on exact test items. Did he believe this? I think he did. Teachers and administrators who have not studied Measurement and Evaluation in college often do not realize that there is something wrong with teaching to the test or teaching the exact test. Naturally this practice invalidates a standardized test. The practice of teaching to the test and teaching the actual test is widespread and has been used to support “miraculous reforms” in our schools. I’m glad the truth is finally being reported by the media. It certainly took them a long time to catch on.
If we really want to know how much children are learning, we’d have to have a new test each year. It would have to be wide range in order to measure the progress of children who are years below grade level, and it would have to be professionally administered and proctored. Sound expensive? Yes, and that’s just one of the problems.