"Least influential of education's most influential information sources."
-- Education Week Research Center
"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash of humor"
-- Education Week
"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity... they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Mickey Kaus
"a very smart blog... this is the site to read"
-- Ryan Lizza
"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Richard Colvin
"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily
"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly
"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education
"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts
"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin
"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams
"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress
"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner
-- Education Week's Alyson Klein
-- Susan Ohanian
Smart List: 60 People Shaping the Future of K-12 Education
11 Replies to “Duncan Dodges Cold Iron Shackles And A Ball And Chain?”
Let me see if I understand.
You were hired by the state of Tennessee to conduct an independent search for a school district leader and you recommended the founder of a school who pays your salary.
Don’t you think there is a conflict of interest in this recommendation?
Just like Richard Cheney selecting himself for vice president.
No, Mr. Rotherham doesn’t see a conflict of interest.
They are just looking after one another.
I wonder what Mr. Huffman is going to do about the new requirement that Tenn. schools give creationism equal time.
I am waiting for Smyr to defend this…
Ah yes, should I do this before or after you reply to the other thread?
eduwonk . com/2011/05/political-maze.html#comment-220604
Of course, if I’m going to be summoned to a thread I never posted in — and only hours after the first comment from someone who devalues honest debate before even reading past his handle — perhaps others could follow-up on any past dropped discussions?
I’ve responded, but I’m not changing my name.
I think its appropriate given the fact that the Gates foundation, the Wallace foundation and Broad foundation are driving education policy in this country.
I think it is important to disclose who owns you. I am not owned by anyone. Bellwether on the other hand, has received a $300,000 charitable donation on their latest tax return. They also blacked out the name of the donor. Maybe it was Chris Barbic, we will never know.
I am overjoyed at your generosity of allowing me a full 2 days to write my response, and I express my sincere gratitude for your not being too overbearing in asking for a timelier reply. You will find a response addressed to you in the other thread, proofread thrice and awaiting a thorough read. Please accept my deepest apologies for making you wait a couple days for a response to your comment on an education blog. In the future, I will be sure to better manage my ever-shifting work schedule to accommodate your pressing desire to read my contributions to any online debates.
No fooling: I find your comments irrational and think you make a weak case for the arguments you’ve proffered. As a lesson for Cal and other commenters who are like him, I’m going to do what they ought to but seldom do and continue to respond in efforts to add to the discussion, since I know that flatly asserting that you are wrong/inept/”unable to read” — or leveling other sleazy claims about your background or motivations — is about as worthless of a response as silence (and maybe more so), and we sure get a lot of both here and elsewhere in the edu-blogosphere.
With that said, I want to emphasize the fact that noting where an individual gets his/her funding does not imply that person is “owned” by such entity. School reform is being driven by many passionate people with a different take on how to fix our schools — it’s not just money talking. Your continued refrain of assuming bad-faith on the part of reformers, particularly with the really pathetic use of a comment handle, is not making your case any stronger. And I will mock it accordingly.
You didn’t actually address this issue.
Isn’t there a conflict of interest in running an independent job search and recommending someone who is paying you for consulting services?
Because it’s about as much of an issue as the bad-faith nonsense you were suggesting before.
The disclosure doesn’t state that Bellwether was receiving compensation at the time the search was made, so that gives a succinct answer to your question: No. Not every conflict of interest requires recusal, either; Tennessee was likely aware of the disclosure as given in this blog post.
It should have gone before a conflict of interest board and it did not.
Given the info presented here, it did not need to.