"Least influential of education's most influential information sources."
-- Education Week Research Center
"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash of humor"
-- Education Week
"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity... they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Mickey Kaus
"a very smart blog... this is the site to read"
-- Ryan Lizza
"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Richard Colvin
"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily
"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly
"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education
"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts
"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin
"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams
"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress
"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner
"Fabulous"
-- Education Week's Alyson Klein
"thugs"
-- Susan Ohanian
Smart List: 60 People Shaping the Future of K-12 Education
Great comment on Conor’s column:
efavorite succeeds at misinformed ad hominem proving nothing. You need better role models, Phil.
Chris Smyr Says:
January 7th, 2011 at 7:41 pm
efavorite succeeds at misinformed ad hominem proving nothing. You need better role models, Phil.
Translation:
I’m still mad at the Marlboro Man for calling me an asshole.
I’m glad that once more Phil has called attention to an important travesty. Actually, in this case, two travesties. First, the government providing financial assistance to teachers who choose to teach poor children. What a terrible, terrible thing. Shame!
Second, the Washington Post publishing columns on its op-ed page from doctoral candidates in political theory with a broad base in philosophy. What are they thinking? This is why I get my news from Terre Haute.
No problem, edconsumer.
You left off the bit though that a perfidious montebank like Conor would become the state secretary of education.
PS I’m glad I know a few TFAs and Teaching Fellows.
Otherwise, observing Chris, Conor, Michelle Rhee, Kevin Huffman, Wendy Kopp et. al. would lead me to believe that they are the stereotypical liberal know-it-all. The nattering nabobs of negativity as Patrick Buchanan prompted Spiro Agnew to quip.
You don’t find them in Terre Haute.
The epithet about nattering nabobs was coined by Bill Safire, who later regretted it, at least on stylistic grounds. No word on that from Pat or Spiro.
So I point out you’re an idiot, and that makes me a know-it-all? If it were that easy! I’ll go ahead tell my orals committee that I already know everything, and that we can skip the exams.
I’ll vouch on your behalf, Chris.
I’ll let them know that you know it all, if you know what I mean.
BTW, are you heading out this way for the 20th anniversary of Teach For Awhile.
Wendy plans a big shindig.
She even has Justin Beiber making an appearance.
I guess that’s to keep up the teaching is sexy movement.
However, I don’t think Wendy will have her alum show their noblesse oblige by doing a teach-in at any of the poor performing schools in DCPS or the nearby suburbs.
Thanks, Art.
Pat Buchanan hosted Crossfire with Tom Braden on the local WRC radio back in the late 70s and early 80s. I remember the p[hrase being mentioned, and I recall Pat taking ownership.
Here’s a few of their other quips:
“pusillanimous pussyfooters”,
“hopeless, hysterical hypochondriacs of history”
I did think the op-ed was tin-eared. After all, what DC readers are going to care if this TFA alum threatens to not live in DC. TFA, for all its strengths as a program, has a built-in “love you and leave you” aspect, so this article only reinforces that transience. We never thought he’d stay, so it’s no big loss.
^ The first criticizing comment that doesn’t sound completely nutso. Thanks.
I thought that the article was more about Gray and the edu-climate in DC than Conor’s given example of where he should live. It’s not like he is the only one pondering questions of how Gray will perform or if schools there will get better.
Also, I disagree with your take on TFA’s transience. Isn’t that true of all young folks who take up a job in a new place, and more specifically for new teachers?
The former urban educator now plans to be a former D.C. resident if the mayor disappoints him on one issue?!?! Grow up. We don’t need those sorts of wimps in schools serving kids who have really suffered.
RE: John Thompson-
Reading and math teachers now plan to be former reading and math teachers if one portion of their evaluation is based on a measure of their impact on children?!?! Grow up. We don’t need those sorts of wimps in schools serving kids who have really suffered.
John:
1) That “one issue” will reflect generally on district/school/teacher performance. Hopefully not more needs to be said in explaining to you why this is important…
2) He’s definitely not the first one to choose where to raise a family based on the availability of good schools, so give the guy a break.
Phil, Michelle Rhee is a liberal? So weird. Her detractors keep writing she is a conservative. Same with Wendy Kopp come to think of it. This place is so confusing! I can’t even keep track of why I’m supposed to hate the reform crowd any more.
Though I get the Conor piece, John. God forbid that people who live in major cities start deciding whether to buy homes based on whether the schools are good. If those wimps start caring too much about one issue, like whether schools are good, the next thing you know, they will start asking questions. Ugh, I hate questions.