"Least influential of education's most influential information sources."
-- Education Week Research Center
"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash of humor"
-- Education Week
"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity... they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Mickey Kaus
"a very smart blog... this is the site to read"
-- Ryan Lizza
"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Richard Colvin
"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily
"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly
"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education
"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts
"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin
"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams
"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress
"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner
"Fabulous"
-- Education Week's Alyson Klein
"thugs"
-- Susan Ohanian
Smart List: 60 People Shaping the Future of K-12 Education
While the idea is worthwhile, the Common Core article itself is unconvincing.
Pedagogy, management and accountability are not fundamental to education? Why should we think that any set of standards will be utilized appropriately without these three lesser “fads” in place and functional? And why imply that Common Core is both necessary *and* sufficient to end educational equity without these “fads”?
The listed benefits seem a bit off, as well:
* Having state standards also allows teachers to know what will be tested…
* …and these are generally shared among schools that students may transfer in and out of. Unfortunately, review and remediation is a troublesome aspect with our without Common Core, if teachers are going to be using different lesson plans and projects with different expectations in every classroom (which is what happens with state standards). And if students fall behind, they will of course need review and remediation wherever they go.
* Is the thickness of textbooks really one of the reasons for our troubling education problems? Does anyone think that a smaller textbook will really make students more interested in reading it?
* How does Common Core relate to teacher prep programs?
* Collaboration only goes so far. Again, there are a common set of standards in every state, but has that alone been the impetus for teachers from different parts of the state to work together? Teachers in the same department will certainly work together, but they are already doing that to address the standards that are shared at their school/state.