"Least influential of education's most influential information sources."
-- Education Week Research Center
"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash of humor"
-- Education Week
"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity... they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Mickey Kaus
"a very smart blog... this is the site to read"
-- Ryan Lizza
"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Richard Colvin
"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily
"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly
"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education
"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts
"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin
"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams
"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress
"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner
-- Education Week's Alyson Klein
-- Susan Ohanian
Smart List: 60 People Shaping the Future of K-12 Education
4 Replies to “Three’s A Trend?”
It’s not like Massachusetts and Minnesota have far to go to get to the top in math. It’s been a couple of years and nobody seems to want to know about how they got there.
See more here:
I liked the good old days when Presidents of the Chamber of Commerce like Olson were against the massive intrusion of federal dollars and mandates inherent to RTTT and would stand up for local control even if it meant siding with a union or two.
Indiana will not apply a second time for a piece of the $4.4 billion pot of federal “Race to the Top” education reform money because state officials could not secure union support.
Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Bennett, who last summer lauded the state’s chances of scoring big bucks from the program, announced Thursday that he would stop efforts under way to write an application.
Without support from teachers unions, he said, it wasn’t worth the state’s time to apply again
and this Bennett said, “and I promise to make sure discussions between (the state) and the unions are transparent to all stakeholders.”
That last line would be funny if it wasn’t for Mr. Bennett’s intellectual dishonesty. As I previously reposted at Eduwonk, he wanted the teachers to sign on without seeing his plan.
Now he promises to be transparent.
He must be a product of the Stanford school of education.