"Least influential of education's most influential information sources."
-- Education Week Research Center
"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash of humor"
-- Education Week
"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity... they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Mickey Kaus
"a very smart blog... this is the site to read"
-- Ryan Lizza
"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Richard Colvin
"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily
"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly
"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education
"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts
"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin
"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams
"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress
"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner
-- Education Week's Alyson Klein
-- Susan Ohanian
Smart List: 60 People Shaping the Future of K-12 Education
3 Replies to “Houston, We Have Statements”
It is interesting that many people keep citing statistics about the small number of teachers fired in public schools. Obviously, these people have never served in school leadership positions.
In Texas, principals can relatively easily fire teachers. But it is much, much easier to convince the ineffective teachers to simply leave the profession–or at least the school employing the teacher.
So, while districts have on record relatively few teachers being fired, a far greater number of teachers get counseled or pushed out of the profession. Why it is so important to actually fire people? Perhaps fear of the dance of the lemons, but firing someone does not necessarily stop the dance of the lemons–especially in a state like Texas where poor. minority, and low-performing schools have little choice but to hire the lest qualified and lest effective teachers.
So, I think we should all be careful when using “statistics” about the low number of teachers being fired without acknowledging that, at least in states without unions, the number of teachers “fired” is actually much, much greater than what gets reported.
Also interesting that the Dem for Ed Reform blog calls out teacher unions as the cause of the problem. There are NO unions in Texas. Any principal who wants to fire a teacher can relatively easily do so if s/he simply follows correct procedures such as documenting ineffectiveness, providing opportunities for improvement, and then documenting continued low performance.
Ed, thanks for stating the obvious. During the first five years of employment, almost half of all new teachers leave the profession. Although many leave of their own volition, many are asked to leave, or are “counseled out.” Because teachers are on contracts, the word “fired” is seldom used. A teacher is almost always given the option to resign, and most take this option. They are then listed as “resignations” and not “terminations.”
In my 42 years of teaching I remember quite a few teachers who were “non-renewed” or asked to resign, but I can only think of three teachers and one principal who were fired. Three of these people committed crimes and one abandoned his position.
Frankly I’m surprised the media hasn’t caught on to this.