"Least influential of education's most influential information sources."
-- Education Week Research Center
"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash of humor"
-- Education Week
"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity... they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Mickey Kaus
"a very smart blog... this is the site to read"
-- Ryan Lizza
"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Richard Colvin
"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily
"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly
"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education
"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts
"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin
"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams
"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress
"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner
-- Education Week's Alyson Klein
-- Susan Ohanian
Smart List: 60 People Shaping the Future of K-12 Education
3 Replies to “Why Meaningful Teacher Evaluation Matters: Local Edition”
I suspect there’s a reasonable grand bargain out there splitting the labor market for teachers into an experienced- and inexperienced-teacher set of slots. The closest thing to a consensus among researchers in teaching is that at least a few years of experience matters a great deal, and I’m hesitant to believe that principals’ seat-of-the-pants judgment on bright-eyed, bushy-tailed newbies is somehow going to be good next year though it hasn’t been great in the past.
How to operationalize such a split is hard: how do you decide which schools get to hire more-experienced faculty (with principal choice) and which have to enter a lottery for first-year, second-year, and third-year teachers? Well, that may be one way of addressing the comparability debate in Title I, but it’s much easier with elementary schools than when you have subject specializations.
I know: I’ve mostly skipped the legal question. The general answer I’ve been told as a union chapter leader is that there are some mandatory subjects of bargaining (defined within each state somewhat differently outside issues of pay, benefits, discipline, and a range of other matters), and when an issue is a management right, there is still a right to bargain the impact of a management decision. Easy example: a school district in Florida can set its school hours as it wants, but the duty hours for teachers (affected by such a decision) are a matter of collective bargaining.
Slightly off-topic, and with no offense to the person posting this – but I am so incredibly tired of words like “meaningful” in the discussion about education. We don’t just have teachers; we have “caring” teachers. Lesson plans are “engaging” lesson plans. Can’t we just drop these? Can’t we just assume that evaluation is supposed to be meaningful, and that adults in education are caring? Why do we have to highlight this?
We need “meaningful” as a modifier here because it has been well established that the current system of evaluation does not tell us nearly enough about teachers’ effectiveness with students. We have evaluation, but we don’t have meaningful evaluation. See http://www.widgeteffect.org.