"Least influential of education's most influential information sources."
-- Education Week Research Center
"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash of humor"
-- Education Week
"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity... they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Mickey Kaus
"a very smart blog... this is the site to read"
-- Ryan Lizza
"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Richard Colvin
"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily
"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly
"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education
"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts
"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin
"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams
"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress
"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner
-- Education Week's Alyson Klein
-- Susan Ohanian
Smart List: 60 People Shaping the Future of K-12 Education
2 Replies to “More Myths…And Colvin’s Stimulated!”
Hettleman goes so far out of his way to be balanced that the result is a very watered-down article.
“Teachers know best how to teach kids; policymakers should leave them alone.” The problem isn’t that policymakers are telling teachers how to teach, it’s that they are making mandates and forcing us to figure out how to teach to meet those mandates. We don’t agree with their goals.
I don’t think teachers are against scientific research in education. It is difficult, however, to keep up and to apply research to your own classroom. Furthermore, much of the publicized research has been cherry-picked to support the agenda of policy makers and educational technology corporations. Read enough of it and you are likely to become cynical about educational research.
I firmly believe that the first step in educational reform is to put education back in the hands of educators. Why? Well, they are the experts. That doesn’t guarantee you will always agree with them, but chances are, they know better than you. Not only do they have the formal schooling to back them, but they also have actual experience in the classroom which is more than many of our politicians, policy makers, and advisers can say.
I laugh at the notion Mr. Hettleman made about teachers resisting scientific research at the insistence of college professors. On the contrary! While a student studying education, both undergraduate and graduate work, I was encouraged by my professors to stay current on research and always pay attention to which way the pendulum was swinging. Like many other professions, trends come and go. Lucky for me, I was taught by my professors to pay attention to research and always make note of who commissioned the study, what the sample consisted of, and what assessment measures were used. Most importantly, one of the most valuable lessons I learned in college – be smart about research being reported because, as Loren stated above, it is easy to cherry-pick the results to support a certain cause, trend, and/ or agenda.