"Least influential of education's most influential information sources."
-- Education Week Research Center
"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash of humor"
-- Education Week
"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity... they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Mickey Kaus
"a very smart blog... this is the site to read"
-- Ryan Lizza
"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Richard Colvin
"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily
"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly
"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education
"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts
"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin
"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams
"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress
"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner
-- Education Week's Alyson Klein
-- Susan Ohanian
Smart List: 60 People Shaping the Future of K-12 Education
One Reply to “It’s All Digital!”
I’m glad you liked that MacArthur report. I personally found it fascinating.
I think your concern about access misses the forest for the trees, however.
The fundamental message of the MacArthur report is that in the (essentially) last element of children’s lives that has not been colonized by formal education in schools, the most dynamic learning takes place. The whole report is an argument in technological congruence with democratic education theorists: there need be no force applied for children to want to learn. No one forces kids to spend hours ‘geeking out’ on the origins of the universe by following link after link through Wikipedia, developing social opinions through their Newsfeed on Facebook, or testing political arguments in chatrooms and blog comment sections.
It seems, rather, that BECAUSE these acts largely remain outside the realm of formal education, BECAUSE they derive their meaning and authority from their personal usefulness rather than their being “21st century skills for a 21st century workforce”, BECAUSE the Internet respects freedom of movement (from one site or topic to another), doesn’t judge the bored as stupid, and never assesses its users, all that children learn on the Internet is held closer, remembered longer, and respected much more than what they are required to learn/attempt-to-remember-in-time-for-the-test in school.
I think this is the first of many reports that are going to lead to the marriage of democratic education theory (which valorizes the skills that underpin the Internet such as creativity, innovation, community-building, knowledge sharing, and freedom of thought) and Web 2.0 which provides the essential technology for children to effectively take responsibility for their own knowledge, expertise, and social network.