"Least influential of education's most influential information sources."
-- Education Week Research Center
"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash of humor"
-- Education Week
"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity... they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Mickey Kaus
"a very smart blog... this is the site to read"
-- Ryan Lizza
"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Richard Colvin
"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily
"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly
"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education
"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts
"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin
"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams
"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress
"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner
-- Education Week's Alyson Klein
-- Susan Ohanian
Smart List: 60 People Shaping the Future of K-12 Education
2 Replies to “Data!”
There is a huge difference between using imperfect models for performance pay as opposed to evaluations, tenure, licensing, etc. A margin of error that may be approprate for incentives (for either teachers or poor schools) could easily be inappropriate for putting a person’s career in jeopardy.
That’s anothe reason why you should be much more careful with the word “reformer.” If you really want to help poor kids, out of respect for other educators who are just as sincere, you should stop the insults.
Under no circumstances can the unions move forward unless you differientiate between the differing uses that you want for value-added models. If you want good-faith agreements, you must distinquish between using flawed or semi-flawed models for incentive plans or in conjunction with other methods, as opposed to using those plans for taking away the carreers of teachers. Unless we draw that distinction we will never be able to grow the teaching profession.
And you should repudiate people like Rhee and in Florida where there isn’t even much of a pretence of making the models fair and reliable. It is tough enough to move an entire profession when people are negotiating in good faith. You should take a leadership role in cleaning up your own house.
Any discussion about the “importance” of data relating to teaching and learning misses the boat: the most valuable aspects of teaching and learning can’t be simply quantified.
As a teacher, I’m opposed to any more emphasis on data–it’s already out of control and hurting teacher morale all over the country.