"Least influential of education's most influential information sources."
-- Education Week Research Center
"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash of humor"
-- Education Week
"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity... they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Mickey Kaus
"a very smart blog... this is the site to read"
-- Ryan Lizza
"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Richard Colvin
"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily
"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly
"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education
"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts
"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin
"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams
"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress
"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner
"Fabulous"
-- Education Week's Alyson Klein
"thugs"
-- Susan Ohanian
Smart List: 60 People Shaping the Future of K-12 Education
Murray has made a career out of taking kernels of truth and turning them into stupidity.
If the changed the words
“We will urge large numbers of people who do not possess adequate ability to try to achieve the goal”
to
“We will urge large numbers of people who are not adequately prepared to achieve the goal”
then he is pretty much spot on isn’t he.
Yes, Rory, I think you are right. But that’s not a small distinction.
In your setup, the question becomes:
Do we take inadequate preparation as a given and inevitable, and go from there, as Murray does?
or
Do we focus more on legitimately preparing large numbers of people for college? Murray takes this option off the table.
GGW,
While I agree than inadequate preparation is a huge issue that must be addressed (count me in as a huge school reformist), I don’t think the set up changes the overall point.
I think the key issue is whether the typical BA is required, even if every single kid in America is prepared to earn one.
My key agreement with Murray is that a Certification system for many occuppations would be a lot more cost effective and practical than simply requiring a bachelors degree that has very little applicability to the chosen field.
After living in Europe for many years, Germany and the Netherlands seem so have the most rational system of higher education. There is a much wider variety of job training, apprenticeship, higher education options available.