"Least influential of education's most influential information sources."
-- Education Week Research Center
"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash of humor"
-- Education Week
"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity... they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Mickey Kaus
"a very smart blog... this is the site to read"
-- Ryan Lizza
"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Richard Colvin
"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily
"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly
"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education
"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts
"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin
"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams
"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress
"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner
-- Education Week's Alyson Klein
-- Susan Ohanian
Smart List: 60 People Shaping the Future of K-12 Education
3 Replies to “Determinism Dashed!”
“Fact number one is that Maryland sets the bar defining proficiency very close to the ground,” said Bruce Fuller, a professor of education and public policy at the University of California at Berkeley. “State officials are under enormous political pressure to show progress.”
Thanks for the link, because I make the serial argument that Fuller makes.
“Fuller added, however, that the upward trajectory on both the national and state tests suggests “that kids in Maryland are learning more over the course of the year now than they were in the 1990s.”
Come to think of it, I also acknowledge that researchers like Fuller know much more about the national evidence, and that even state scores show that some good things are happening. But I also discuss the costs and the damage, and above all the better solutions that are available.
Also, you should check NAEP patterns for low-income, low-performing schools and students, and even the state results in states that are not as rich as Maryland, before you bet on me winning the Derby.
What a stupid comment.
[quote]if scores go up for low-income students during this economy, we know those numbers are bogus. [/quote]
How is this the case?
Where is the PRIORITIZATION from the parents and the other managers of these education for these children which can work to isolate their academic performance from their economic situation?
Would Mr. Thompson be relived to see more cable TV subscriptions being disconnected as parents save the $75 per month so their kids receive the nutrition that they need in these “tough times”?
Where is the expectations from the parents to invest in this ticket to insure that their kids have a reduced chance of struggling as they did?