"Least influential of education's most influential information sources."
-- Education Week Research Center
"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash of humor"
-- Education Week
"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity... they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Mickey Kaus
"a very smart blog... this is the site to read"
-- Ryan Lizza
"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Richard Colvin
"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily
"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly
"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education
"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts
"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin
"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams
"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress
"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner
-- Education Week's Alyson Klein
-- Susan Ohanian
Smart List: 60 People Shaping the Future of K-12 Education
One Reply to “Dueling Surveys”
Having a 3rd party conduct a more neutral survey to assess climate can be very helpful. But having the media ask would already skew the answers of educators as they know they would find their answers on the front page…and the media is not exactly known for its attention to research-based practices. More important than who does the survey is
1. The survey here is not about climate, the questions are about an individual (Chancellor Klein) and the respondents would key all their answers based on the first part of the question. Questions should be about schools and conditions, not people.
2. The questions should be research-based and be about things that not just relate to “climate” or “satisfaction” but positive teaching conditions necessary for student and educator success
3. The results should be gathered at the school level (where many differences can be seen in the same district)and used for school improvement planning as well as to influence the district
There are some great examples of this not only in our own surveys I do at the New Teacher Center, but in Chicago through the Consortium on Chicago School Research. And some good examples within unions as well as such as the NEA KEYS Survey If we’re going to ask 100,000 teachers about their thoughts and needs, let’s make sure we do it in such a way that empowers them and gives them data to improve their own environments.