"Least influential of education's most influential information sources."
-- Education Week Research Center
"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash of humor"
-- Education Week
"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity... they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Mickey Kaus
"a very smart blog... this is the site to read"
-- Ryan Lizza
"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Richard Colvin
"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily
"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly
"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education
"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts
"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin
"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams
"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress
"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner
-- Education Week's Alyson Klein
-- Susan Ohanian
Smart List: 60 People Shaping the Future of K-12 Education
2 Replies to “Must Read Kolderie”
Woah. Thanks for drawing attention to this!
I also enjoyed the Commentary, but I’m also curious about your response. Paul Tillich challenged us to take “a leap of faith” into the “Unknown,” and that is what we must do in education. And it seems obvious to me that we need numerous,different leaps into a bunch of different unknowns.
On a practical level, I see us as being defeated by this paradox. We need more than incremental improvements, especially to prepare our poorest kids, for the 21st century. So we “swing for the fences” at every turn at the plate. Frustrated by the inertia of traditional schools, we gamble on reforms that we hope to scale up. But most degenerate into half-baked quick fixes that really aren’t much different than the old reforms de jour of traditional education.
I see his article as saying, if nothing else, reforms must come cafeteria-style and can’t be imposed as a one size fits all mandate. Do you agree?
So getting back to policy and politics, why not invest in a series of initiatives to build capacity, such as a Marshall Plan for teachers, and the same for principals, and pre-K and early ed, and graduation and recovery efforts for older teens, and Turnaround efforts. Accountability would be built into each. The quest for some overarching, national, systemic, data-driven accountability could be put on the back burner, and in the meantime testing could be used for diagnostic purposes. Such a suggestion would not be nearly as daring as the Commentary’s “nonpolitical” suggestion that “we could let different forms of schooling be adopted …”assuring others … that the ‘different’ will not be imposed on them, and having them in turn agree not to suppress the innovation.”
If you agree with that logic, shouldn’t we ask whether NCLB would have been more efective if its testing had been diagnostic?