Important, longish, and Sunday NYT editorial on Creationism/Intelligent Design. Sure to spark debate. NYT’s bottom line:
…in districts where evolution is a burning issue, there ought to be some place in school where the religious and cultural criticisms of evolution can be discussed, perhaps in a comparative religion class or a history or current events course. But school boards need to recognize that neither creationism nor intelligent design is an alternative to Darwinism as a scientific explanation of the evolution of life.