<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Four Reasons Pre-K Faces An Uphill Climb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eduwonk.com/2013/02/four-reasons-pre-k-faces-an-uphill-climb.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2013/02/four-reasons-pre-k-faces-an-uphill-climb.html</link>
	<description>Education News, Analysis, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 07:47:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2013/02/four-reasons-pre-k-faces-an-uphill-climb.html/comment-page-1#comment-257973</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eduwonk.com/?p=12465#comment-257973</guid>
		<description>Reason #1 reminds me of an interesting article I came across last fall:

http://humcap.uchicago.edu/RePEc/hka/wpaper/Dugger_Litan_2012_early-childhood-pay.pdf

Does anyone know if mechanisms such as social impact bonds have been put into practice yet for Pre-K services?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reason #1 reminds me of an interesting article I came across last fall:</p>
<p><a href="http://humcap.uchicago.edu/RePEc/hka/wpaper/Dugger_Litan_2012_early-childhood-pay.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://humcap.uchicago.edu/RePEc/hka/wpaper/Dugger_Litan_2012_early-childhood-pay.pdf</a></p>
<p>Does anyone know if mechanisms such as social impact bonds have been put into practice yet for Pre-K services?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: f0rTyLeGz</title>
		<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2013/02/four-reasons-pre-k-faces-an-uphill-climb.html/comment-page-1#comment-257684</link>
		<dc:creator>f0rTyLeGz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 01:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eduwonk.com/?p=12465#comment-257684</guid>
		<description>I agree.  Pre-kindergarten is pretty much baby sitting.  Parents should be teaching their kids to read as soon as they can sit up.  If you leave it up to school to teach your child to read, and to add and divide you are starting them off years behind the kids who can already read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  Pre-kindergarten is pretty much baby sitting.  Parents should be teaching their kids to read as soon as they can sit up.  If you leave it up to school to teach your child to read, and to add and divide you are starting them off years behind the kids who can already read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda/RetiredTeacher</title>
		<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2013/02/four-reasons-pre-k-faces-an-uphill-climb.html/comment-page-1#comment-257673</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda/RetiredTeacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 20:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eduwonk.com/?p=12465#comment-257673</guid>
		<description>Now that the effects of the recession are waning, research-based solutions to our educational problems are being considered. And that&#039;s a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that the effects of the recession are waning, research-based solutions to our educational problems are being considered. And that&#8217;s a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2013/02/four-reasons-pre-k-faces-an-uphill-climb.html/comment-page-1#comment-257671</link>
		<dc:creator>John Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 19:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eduwonk.com/?p=12465#comment-257671</guid>
		<description>Your points are all well-taken.  In fact, with the benefit of 20 20 hindsight, there is only one argument for the data-driven &quot;reform&quot; movement of the last generation.  Test-driven accountability was cheaper and easier than real reforms that had potential.

But, contemporary &quot;reform&quot; fails.  And, by now it should be clear that it never had a chance.  And, it hasn&#039;t been so all-fired cheap.  We&#039;ve wasted billions of accountability-driven &quot;reform,&quot; and now it has just degenerated into blaming teachers for its failure.  And, now, we aren&#039;t going to have the money for promising approaches.

But, when you&#039;ve dug yourself in a hole, the first step is to stop digging.  The next step should be pre-school.  Let&#039;s hope it is more reality-based than the late, unlamented data-driven &quot;reform&quot; gamble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your points are all well-taken.  In fact, with the benefit of 20 20 hindsight, there is only one argument for the data-driven &#8220;reform&#8221; movement of the last generation.  Test-driven accountability was cheaper and easier than real reforms that had potential.</p>
<p>But, contemporary &#8220;reform&#8221; fails.  And, by now it should be clear that it never had a chance.  And, it hasn&#8217;t been so all-fired cheap.  We&#8217;ve wasted billions of accountability-driven &#8220;reform,&#8221; and now it has just degenerated into blaming teachers for its failure.  And, now, we aren&#8217;t going to have the money for promising approaches.</p>
<p>But, when you&#8217;ve dug yourself in a hole, the first step is to stop digging.  The next step should be pre-school.  Let&#8217;s hope it is more reality-based than the late, unlamented data-driven &#8220;reform&#8221; gamble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
