<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: School Choice Or School&#8217;s Choice?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eduwonk.com/2013/01/school-choice-or-schools-choice.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2013/01/school-choice-or-schools-choice.html</link>
	<description>Education News, Analysis, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:15:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffrey miller</title>
		<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2013/01/school-choice-or-schools-choice.html/comment-page-1#comment-257034</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffrey miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 06:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eduwonk.com/?p=12408#comment-257034</guid>
		<description>&quot;Hidden in plain sight:&quot;

It doesn&#039;t matter, Andrew.  I think we all know how business gets done.  No one should be surprised at all about the results of the Fordham study.  What IS surprising, to me at least, is how private schools have been able to get away with murder in this age of accountability.   

They can say, or do, or testify that whatever they do is whatever they think reality is for them.  And yet, somehow, the rest of us are supposed to rank and sort private schools and public schools (of various denominations) equally.  I see.  Nice system you got there, private schools.  Hide behind First Amendment coattails if you must.  I get that.  But for the love of your God Almighty, please play fair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hidden in plain sight:&#8221;</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter, Andrew.  I think we all know how business gets done.  No one should be surprised at all about the results of the Fordham study.  What IS surprising, to me at least, is how private schools have been able to get away with murder in this age of accountability.   </p>
<p>They can say, or do, or testify that whatever they do is whatever they think reality is for them.  And yet, somehow, the rest of us are supposed to rank and sort private schools and public schools (of various denominations) equally.  I see.  Nice system you got there, private schools.  Hide behind First Amendment coattails if you must.  I get that.  But for the love of your God Almighty, please play fair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhillipMarlowe</title>
		<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2013/01/school-choice-or-schools-choice.html/comment-page-1#comment-256887</link>
		<dc:creator>PhillipMarlowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 01:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eduwonk.com/?p=12408#comment-256887</guid>
		<description>- We all know about the Broad Foundation money that went to Global Education Advisors, NJ Education Commissioner Chris Cerf&#039;s old firm. That money, like the Facebook money, was never supposed to go into the classrooms of Newark: it was used instead to bring in a raft of consultants to remake the city&#039;s schools. Many of the folks hired knew nothing about education, producing a bunch of &quot;hack junk.&quot;

So while we&#039;ve talked quite a bit about Cerf and GEA, there has been less focus on the relationship between Tusk and Cerf:
The second biggest recipient of the Facebook money is Tusk Strategies, a New York political consulting firm that managed Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s 2009 re-election campaign. Cerf left his post as a deputy education chancellor in Bloomberg’s administration to serve on the campaign.
Calls to Tusk were not returned, but according to founder Bradley Tusk’s online biography, the group was responsible for creating and advising PENewark, the heavily-criticized campaign to gather public input on the school reform effort in Newark.
When PENewark first began its work last November, Booker said only $1 million would be spent on the effort — roughly $500,000 for salaries and $500,000 for advertising. Tusk was paid more than $1.5 million between October 2010 and April 2011, according to the e-mails. Taylor said Wednesday the cost of the PENewark initiative was $2 million.

http://jerseyjazzman.blogspot.com/2013/01/more-newark-facebook-follies.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- We all know about the Broad Foundation money that went to Global Education Advisors, NJ Education Commissioner Chris Cerf&#8217;s old firm. That money, like the Facebook money, was never supposed to go into the classrooms of Newark: it was used instead to bring in a raft of consultants to remake the city&#8217;s schools. Many of the folks hired knew nothing about education, producing a bunch of &#8220;hack junk.&#8221;</p>
<p>So while we&#8217;ve talked quite a bit about Cerf and GEA, there has been less focus on the relationship between Tusk and Cerf:<br />
The second biggest recipient of the Facebook money is Tusk Strategies, a New York political consulting firm that managed Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s 2009 re-election campaign. Cerf left his post as a deputy education chancellor in Bloomberg’s administration to serve on the campaign.<br />
Calls to Tusk were not returned, but according to founder Bradley Tusk’s online biography, the group was responsible for creating and advising PENewark, the heavily-criticized campaign to gather public input on the school reform effort in Newark.<br />
When PENewark first began its work last November, Booker said only $1 million would be spent on the effort — roughly $500,000 for salaries and $500,000 for advertising. Tusk was paid more than $1.5 million between October 2010 and April 2011, according to the e-mails. Taylor said Wednesday the cost of the PENewark initiative was $2 million.</p>
<p><a href="http://jerseyjazzman.blogspot.com/2013/01/more-newark-facebook-follies.html" rel="nofollow">http://jerseyjazzman.blogspot.com/2013/01/more-newark-facebook-follies.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arotherham</title>
		<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2013/01/school-choice-or-schools-choice.html/comment-page-1#comment-256880</link>
		<dc:creator>arotherham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eduwonk.com/?p=12408#comment-256880</guid>
		<description>Hidden in plain sight:

http://bellwethereducation.org/people/who-we-work-with/

And not relevant in this case. The work had nothing to do with this Fordham report or item. It was research about school leadership programs and a published analysis of state teacher evaluation laws (which cited the foundation as the funder as is appropriate):

http://bellwethereducation.org/recent-state-action-on-teacher-effectiveness/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hidden in plain sight:</p>
<p><a href="http://bellwethereducation.org/people/who-we-work-with/" rel="nofollow">http://bellwethereducation.org/people/who-we-work-with/</a></p>
<p>And not relevant in this case. The work had nothing to do with this Fordham report or item. It was research about school leadership programs and a published analysis of state teacher evaluation laws (which cited the foundation as the funder as is appropriate):</p>
<p><a href="http://bellwethereducation.org/recent-state-action-on-teacher-effectiveness/" rel="nofollow">http://bellwethereducation.org/recent-state-action-on-teacher-effectiveness/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhillipMarlowe</title>
		<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2013/01/school-choice-or-schools-choice.html/comment-page-1#comment-256879</link>
		<dc:creator>PhillipMarlowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eduwonk.com/?p=12408#comment-256879</guid>
		<description>Careful, Kurt.
Andy can falsely accuse teacher unions of protecting child sexual abusers, but don&#039;t you dare accuse him of being on the take.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Careful, Kurt.<br />
Andy can falsely accuse teacher unions of protecting child sexual abusers, but don&#8217;t you dare accuse him of being on the take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt Kobelt</title>
		<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2013/01/school-choice-or-schools-choice.html/comment-page-1#comment-256877</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Kobelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 20:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eduwonk.com/?p=12408#comment-256877</guid>
		<description>Why don&#039;t you in the interest of transperancy disclose that you receive $185,000 from theWalton Foundation, according to Diane Ravitch.  You are bought and paid for!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t you in the interest of transperancy disclose that you receive $185,000 from theWalton Foundation, according to Diane Ravitch.  You are bought and paid for!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
