This week surrogates from the Obama and Romney campaigns will discuss education policy issues here. This is a post by Melody Barnes, former Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy, on behalf of the Obama campaign:
A quality education provides a sturdy ladder to the American Dream and can lead to widespread economic growth for our country. But we’re at a crossroads – a make-or-break moment for America – and in November, the country will choose between two very different paths. Our decision will determine whether we move backward or continue the forward course set by President Obama – a bold path that spurred reform in schools, while preparing students to be the innovators, job creators and workers of tomorrow.
Our children rank in the middle of the pack in reading and science and far behind their global peers in math. In just over a generation, America has fallen from first to 16th in the world in its share of young people who hold a college degree.
To achieve better results so America once again leads the world in college graduates by 2020, each of us has a role to play. As parents, we’ve got a responsibility to make sure homework gets done and instill a love of learning. As a nation, we’ve got a responsibility to provide students the critical tools they need – from the latest textbooks to science labs that actually work.
In return, we should demand better performance and reform. And that was the idea behind President Obama’s Race to the Top initiative. For less than 1 percent of what our nation spends on education each year, we’ve spurred nearly every state to adopt higher standards for teaching and learning. Now, reform and resources are closing the achievement gap at America’s lowest-performing schools, and double-digit proficiency increases are already evident in schools across the country.
We know a good teacher can increase the lifetime income of a classroom by over $250,000. That’s why the President is fighting to keep good teachers in classrooms despite state budget cuts, and proposing to reward the best ones, improve teacher preparation and performance and replace teachers who just aren’t helping children learn.
When it comes to fixing what’s wrong with No Child Left Behind, President Obama said, if you’re willing to set higher, more honest standards, we’ll give you flexibility to meet those standards. We combine greater freedom with greater accountability. Because what might work in Nevada may not work in Kentucky, but every student in America should have the same opportunity to reach their potential.
Since day one, President Obama has set our nation on a forward course through stronger schools and better teachers. Gov. Mitt Romney, however, offers a different course for the country that takes three big steps backward.
For two decades – and on a bipartisan basis – we’ve made a national commitment to intervene in persistently failing schools. Yet Romney would replace reform with a duplicative school report card that already exists in every state. He would wash his hands of the problem entirely.
While President Obama and Romney both support public school choice, Romney proposes to make funding portable for students from low-income families or with disabilities. But federal funding is already based on enrollment, and it’s less than $1,500 for each poor child. Romney’s idea would not only divert some funds to private-school vouchers – undermining public schools that will always serve the majority of students – but it won’t be nearly enough for a parent to pay for private school or produce the results our most vulnerable children deserve.
Romney also misses the mark on teacher effectiveness, proposing nothing new. His teacher tenure and evaluation system reforms are already underway in most states. And by naming Congressman Paul Ryan as his running mate, Romney embraces the extreme Republican budget that could cut 2 million children over the next decade from Head Start, and slash K-12 education putting teachers’ jobs at risk and increase class size. And Romney rejects what parents and teachers know: that smaller classes are one of the things that help students learn, especially young children.
As our economy recovers, we need a president who understands that education is an investment in our future – an economic imperative that should be within the reach of every family, not a luxury. Many details remain missing from Romney’s education proposals, but we know he would turn back the clock on reform and leave our country without the tools to prepare our children to compete and succeed.
President Obama believes every student should have the opportunity to rise as far as their hard work and initiative will take them. That’s why he is working with Republicans and Democrats; teachers, parents and students; business leaders and advocates to ensure America out-educates the world. In November, we must choose course wisely. We can’t afford to turn back now.