PR lessons from Baltimore. Here’s my take on the larger issues from a few months ago.
This entry was posted on Friday, June 24th, 2011 at 5:27 pm. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
"Least influential of education's most influential information sources."
-- Education Week Research Center
"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity... they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Mickey Kaus
"Fabulous"
-- Education Week's Alyson Klein
"a very smart blog... [if] you're trying to separate the demagogic attacks on NCLB from the serious criticism, this is the site to read"
-- Ryan Lizza
"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Hechinger Institute on Education and the Media's Richard Colvin
"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my
high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash of humor"
-- Education Week
"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily
"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly
"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education
"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts
"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin
"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams, fallen journalist, Executive Director, Democrats for Education Reform
"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress, former education advisor to President Bush and former chairman, Dallas Board of
Education
"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner, champion letter-to-the-editor writer and retired teacher
"thugs"
-- Susan Ohanian
2007 Winner, Editor's Choice Best Education Blog
-- Performancing.com
2006 Winner, Best K-12 Administration Blog -- "Best of the Education Blog Awards"
-- eSchool News and Discovery Education
2006 Finalist, Best Education Blog
-- Weblog Awards
![]() Collective Bargaining in Education: Negotiating Change in Today's Schools Edited by Jane Hannaway and Andrew J. Rotherham
| ![]() Better Benefits: Reforming Teacher Pensions for a Changing Work Force By Chad Aldeman and Andrew J. Rotherham |
![]() A Qualified Teacher in Every Classroom Edited by Frederick M. Hess, Andrew J. Rotherham, and Kate Walsh |
![]() Conflicting Missions and Unclear Results: Lessons from the Education Stimulus Funds By Sara Mead, Anand Vaishnav, William Porter, and Andrew J. Rotherham |
![]() Rethinking Special Education For A New Century Edited by Chester E. Finn, Jr., Andrew J. Rotherham & Charles R. Hokanson, Jr. |
![]() Location, Location, Location: How Would a High-Performing Charter School Network Fare in Different States? By Chris Lozier & Andrew J. Rotherham |
![]() Changing the Game: The Federal Role in Supporting 21st Century Educational Innovation By Andrew J. Rotherham and Sara Mead |
![]() Achieving Teacher and Principal Excellence: A Guidebook for Donors By Andrew J. Rotherham |
Eduwonk is powered by
WordPress | © 2007 - Retrofitted by ArtyBlogs
|
Entries (RSS)
and Comments (RSS).
June 24th, 2011 at 6:00 pm
Actually I found from my many years of teaching that the cheating comes from above. The usual method is to tell the teachers that it’s OK to “familiarize yourself” with the test and “prepare the children.” After that the administrator often “helps” the teacher by preparing test materials that essentially have the same or nearly the same items as the real test. One assistant superintendent, a very nice man, actually told us that he had been to a testing conference and was told that it is OK to drill children on exact test items. Did he believe this? I think he did. Teachers and administrators who have not studied Measurement and Evaluation in college often do not realize that there is something wrong with teaching to the test or teaching the exact test. Naturally this practice invalidates a standardized test. The practice of teaching to the test and teaching the actual test is widespread and has been used to support “miraculous reforms” in our schools. I’m glad the truth is finally being reported by the media. It certainly took them a long time to catch on.
If we really want to know how much children are learning, we’d have to have a new test each year. It would have to be wide range in order to measure the progress of children who are years below grade level, and it would have to be professionally administered and proctored. Sound expensive? Yes, and that’s just one of the problems.