<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Riddle Me This!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eduwonk.com/2010/07/riddle-me-this-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2010/07/riddle-me-this-2.html</link>
	<description>Education News, Analysis, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:42:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: melody</title>
		<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2010/07/riddle-me-this-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-208417</link>
		<dc:creator>melody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 03:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eduwonk.com/?p=6797#comment-208417</guid>
		<description>&quot;But in terms of the rhetoric,  what, exactly, is the difference here? &quot;

OK, I&#039;ll bite.  One difference, I would wager, is size.  Certainly none on the list of OTL supporters compare in size to Gates.  Ford is big (not nearly as big as Gates), but doesn&#039;t put a lot of its money into US education as far as I know.  Most of the others on the OTL list are small, to my knowledge.   

Another distinction might in terms of what one might call &quot;aggressiveness.&quot;  That particularly applies to Broad, which is fearless about pushing certain kinds of reform strategies at the district level that often rile people up.  You might call that a different animal than funding national advocacy groups to promote a certain point of view.   

Finally, one might say that OTL represents a more grassroots view.  One might claim with some justice, for example, that the NAACP has a broader swathe of popular support than, say, Bellwether Associates.  Many of the civil rights groups are primarily membership-based organizations, which Bellwether Associates is not, although I may be mistaken.  In which case, Bellwether Associates would largely be a mouthpiece for Gates (and other footing its bills), would it not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But in terms of the rhetoric,  what, exactly, is the difference here? &#8221;</p>
<p>OK, I&#8217;ll bite.  One difference, I would wager, is size.  Certainly none on the list of OTL supporters compare in size to Gates.  Ford is big (not nearly as big as Gates), but doesn&#8217;t put a lot of its money into US education as far as I know.  Most of the others on the OTL list are small, to my knowledge.   </p>
<p>Another distinction might in terms of what one might call &#8220;aggressiveness.&#8221;  That particularly applies to Broad, which is fearless about pushing certain kinds of reform strategies at the district level that often rile people up.  You might call that a different animal than funding national advocacy groups to promote a certain point of view.   </p>
<p>Finally, one might say that OTL represents a more grassroots view.  One might claim with some justice, for example, that the NAACP has a broader swathe of popular support than, say, Bellwether Associates.  Many of the civil rights groups are primarily membership-based organizations, which Bellwether Associates is not, although I may be mistaken.  In which case, Bellwether Associates would largely be a mouthpiece for Gates (and other footing its bills), would it not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

