Party Like It’s 1999!
Nothing changes in this business. Senator Lieberman has a voucher amendment on a piece of legislation moving through the Senate, the education interest groups send letters about how they hate it.
Nothing changes in this business. Senator Lieberman has a voucher amendment on a piece of legislation moving through the Senate, the education interest groups send letters about how they hate it.
This entry was posted on Thursday, March 4th, 2010 at 12:33 pm. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
"Least influential of education's most influential information sources."
-- Education Week Research Center
"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity... they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Mickey Kaus
"Fabulous"
-- Education Week's Alyson Klein
"a very smart blog... [if] you're trying to separate the demagogic attacks on NCLB from the serious criticism, this is the site to read"
-- Ryan Lizza
"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Hechinger Institute on Education and the Media's Richard Colvin
"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my
high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash of humor"
-- Education Week
"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily
"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly
"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education
"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts
"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin
"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams, fallen journalist, Executive Director, Democrats for Education Reform
"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress, former education advisor to President Bush and former chairman, Dallas Board of
Education
"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner, champion letter-to-the-editor writer and retired teacher
"thugs"
-- Susan Ohanian
2007 Winner, Editor's Choice Best Education Blog
-- Performancing.com
2006 Winner, Best K-12 Administration Blog -- "Best of the Education Blog Awards"
-- eSchool News and Discovery Education
2006 Finalist, Best Education Blog
-- Weblog Awards
![]() Collective Bargaining in Education: Negotiating Change in Today's Schools Edited by Jane Hannaway and Andrew J. Rotherham
| ![]() Better Benefits: Reforming Teacher Pensions for a Changing Work Force By Chad Aldeman and Andrew J. Rotherham |
![]() A Qualified Teacher in Every Classroom Edited by Frederick M. Hess, Andrew J. Rotherham, and Kate Walsh |
![]() Conflicting Missions and Unclear Results: Lessons from the Education Stimulus Funds By Sara Mead, Anand Vaishnav, William Porter, and Andrew J. Rotherham |
![]() Rethinking Special Education For A New Century Edited by Chester E. Finn, Jr., Andrew J. Rotherham & Charles R. Hokanson, Jr. |
![]() Location, Location, Location: How Would a High-Performing Charter School Network Fare in Different States? By Chris Lozier & Andrew J. Rotherham |
![]() Changing the Game: The Federal Role in Supporting 21st Century Educational Innovation By Andrew J. Rotherham and Sara Mead |
![]() Achieving Teacher and Principal Excellence: A Guidebook for Donors By Andrew J. Rotherham |
Eduwonk is powered by
WordPress | © 2007 - Retrofitted by ArtyBlogs
|
Entries (RSS)
and Comments (RSS).
March 4th, 2010 at 7:39 pm
I “hate” the idea of private school vouchers because I am an American citizen who prefers that my tax dollars to go to public schools. I like the idea of separation of church and state. I am not opposed to private school scholarships that are sponsored by individuals, institutions or corporations. In fact I pay the tuition for three impoverished children myself. I also favor public school vouchers.
So it’s not just “education interest groups” that are opposed to private school vouchers. Many of us are just ordinary citizens who want our tax dollars to go to public schools.
March 4th, 2010 at 11:26 pm
yes, but if you’re a DC resident and parent of school-aged children, it’s nice to have choice. Many of my friends’ children are recipients of these vouchers. Has allowed them to atleast be in smaller schools,without the chaos that is DCPS. I’m a fierce campion of public ed, but a safe enviroment is literally life saving for some of the neighborhoods (physical and emotional violence). Rhee is just not going to attract quality teachers – not her fault. I’ve watched two generations of students not being served by DC public schools
March 5th, 2010 at 9:38 am
I do agree that the children need a safe place to learn. To me, the perfect compromise would be public charter schools, magnet schools, scholarships and vouchers to public schools outside of the city. Once public tax money is allowed to be used for private schools, we’re going to see all kinds of religious academies. This has been done in other countries, but it really goes against American ideals.
I’m a Catholic who definitely supports Catholic schools, but I don’t think it’s right to ask other citizens to pay for them; nor do I want to pay for schools sponsored by other religions.
March 5th, 2010 at 1:37 pm
Gee-maybe the govt and giant corporations ought to do something about poverty. You provide employment and a livable wage to people and lessen the pernicious effects of generational poverty, then you have a chance to build a functional ed system in DC. Without addressing the issue of poverty, there is no chance.
But we won’t address it because it costs too much money and people like to blame others for not pulling themselves up by their own bootstraps.