<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Race To The Top&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/12/race-to-the-top.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/12/race-to-the-top.html</link>
	<description>Education News, Analysis, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:00:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Miriam Freedman</title>
		<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/12/race-to-the-top.html/comment-page-1#comment-132974</link>
		<dc:creator>Miriam Freedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 21:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eduwonk.com/?p=5058#comment-132974</guid>
		<description>In all the talk of Race to the Top&#039;s $4.5 billion dollars, I&#039;ve been puzzled-- where&#039;s  any mention of the $12 billion dollars that&#039;s being added to special eductation? Where&#039;s any talk of reforming special ed before all these new dollars are added to a 30-year-old system in need of reform and accountability?

Hmmmmm, $4.5 billion vs. $12 billion--why the focus only on the smaller number?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all the talk of Race to the Top&#8217;s $4.5 billion dollars, I&#8217;ve been puzzled&#8211; where&#8217;s  any mention of the $12 billion dollars that&#8217;s being added to special eductation? Where&#8217;s any talk of reforming special ed before all these new dollars are added to a 30-year-old system in need of reform and accountability?</p>
<p>Hmmmmm, $4.5 billion vs. $12 billion&#8211;why the focus only on the smaller number?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the hart</title>
		<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/12/race-to-the-top.html/comment-page-1#comment-130542</link>
		<dc:creator>the hart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eduwonk.com/?p=5058#comment-130542</guid>
		<description>i think what he means is that the list looks like almost every state meaning so much for competition based on states who the most progressive with policy reforms (i.e., carrot and stick approach whittling the list down to those state)... seems not to be the case</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think what he means is that the list looks like almost every state meaning so much for competition based on states who the most progressive with policy reforms (i.e., carrot and stick approach whittling the list down to those state)&#8230; seems not to be the case</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scrooge McDuck</title>
		<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/12/race-to-the-top.html/comment-page-1#comment-130486</link>
		<dc:creator>Scrooge McDuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eduwonk.com/?p=5058#comment-130486</guid>
		<description>For those of us who aren&#039;t fluent in snark, please explain what you mean by your comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of us who aren&#8217;t fluent in snark, please explain what you mean by your comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

