If You Were Wondering
when in the wake of the ARRA data someone would ask this, wonder no longer.
when in the wake of the ARRA data someone would ask this, wonder no longer.
This entry was posted on Thursday, November 12th, 2009 at 12:49 pm. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
"Least influential of education's most influential information sources."
-- Education Week Research Center
"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity... they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Mickey Kaus
"Fabulous"
-- Education Week's Alyson Klein
"a very smart blog... [if] you're trying to separate the demagogic attacks on NCLB from the serious criticism, this is the site to read"
-- Ryan Lizza
"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Hechinger Institute on Education and the Media's Richard Colvin
"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my
high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash of humor"
-- Education Week
"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily
"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly
"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education
"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts
"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin
"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams, fallen journalist, Executive Director, Democrats for Education Reform
"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress, former education advisor to President Bush and former chairman, Dallas Board of
Education
"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner, champion letter-to-the-editor writer and retired teacher
"thugs"
-- Susan Ohanian
2007 Winner, Editor's Choice Best Education Blog
-- Performancing.com
2006 Winner, Best K-12 Administration Blog -- "Best of the Education Blog Awards"
-- eSchool News and Discovery Education
2006 Finalist, Best Education Blog
-- Weblog Awards
![]() Collective Bargaining in Education: Negotiating Change in Today's Schools Edited by Jane Hannaway and Andrew J. Rotherham
| ![]() Better Benefits: Reforming Teacher Pensions for a Changing Work Force By Chad Aldeman and Andrew J. Rotherham |
![]() A Qualified Teacher in Every Classroom Edited by Frederick M. Hess, Andrew J. Rotherham, and Kate Walsh |
![]() Conflicting Missions and Unclear Results: Lessons from the Education Stimulus Funds By Sara Mead, Anand Vaishnav, William Porter, and Andrew J. Rotherham |
![]() Rethinking Special Education For A New Century Edited by Chester E. Finn, Jr., Andrew J. Rotherham & Charles R. Hokanson, Jr. |
![]() Location, Location, Location: How Would a High-Performing Charter School Network Fare in Different States? By Chris Lozier & Andrew J. Rotherham |
![]() Changing the Game: The Federal Role in Supporting 21st Century Educational Innovation By Andrew J. Rotherham and Sara Mead |
![]() Achieving Teacher and Principal Excellence: A Guidebook for Donors By Andrew J. Rotherham |
Eduwonk is powered by
WordPress | © 2007 - Retrofitted by ArtyBlogs
|
Entries (RSS)
and Comments (RSS).
November 12th, 2009 at 1:44 pm
hello Eduwonk !
In a blog of which I am a regular reader I came to know about you, as a good blog in ‘education’. By reading the reviews I can see that its true. From now on you will find me regularly in your blog.
November 12th, 2009 at 7:42 pm
Finn and Hess claim that local school districts could have used the recession as an opportunity to purge their ranks of underperforming teachers. I don’t buy it. Many teacher contracts provide for RIFs to consider things like seniority in a district when determining who gets let go; very few take into account anything having to do with teacher performance. Furthermore, if “bad” teachers were let go due to budget shortfalls, those teachers with the most seniority (or higher degree, etc.) would have been re-hired first. Again, that goes for most public school contracts that I’m familiar with. Without the influx of federal funds, many schools would have had to let teachers go and, according to contract agreements like the one described above, a lot of those could have been good teachers. And some of those good teachers, having been laid off and fed up with inconsistencies in funding and uncertainty, may have left the profession – for good. By keeping all of the teachers, the federal funds allowed for class sizes to remain static, good teachers stayed in schools, and things did not get worse. This is the key thing to consider. Sure, federal stimulus dollars in these instances did not produce dramatic improvements in education (how would they?), but they kept things in many districts from going from bad to worse. It’s not a reformer’s dream, but it was probably better than nothing.
November 13th, 2009 at 12:44 am
Can we please stop pretending that the free marketers at places like the National Review want schools to succeed? It’s been obvious for some time that the real goal of these forces is total privatization of the school system. So of course they don’t want more teachers, since that actually makes schools work.