Some news on teacher tests from MA. And The Times looks at alternate routes.
This entry was posted on Thursday, October 15th, 2009 at 6:53 pm. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
2007 Winner, Editor's Choice Best Education Blog
-- Performancing.com
2006 Winner, Best K-12 Administration Blog -- "Best of the Education Blog Awards"
-- eSchool News and Discovery Education
2006 Finalist, Best Education Blog
-- Weblog Awards
Least influential of education's most influential information sources.
-- Education
Week Research Center
"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity...
they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Slate's Mickey Kaus
"a very smart blog... [if] you're trying to separate the demagogic attacks on NCLB from the serious
criticism, this is the site to read"
-- The New Republic's Ryan Lizza
"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Hechinger Institute on Education and the Media's Richard Colvin
"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my
high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash
of humor"
-- Education Week
"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the
liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily
"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly
"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education
"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts
"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin, AFT Blog
"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams, fallen journalist, Executive Director, Democrats for Education Reform
"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress, former education advisor to President Bush and former chairman, Dallas Board of
Education
"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner, champion letter-to-the-editor writer and retired teacher
"thugs"
-- Susan Ohanian
![]() Collective Bargaining in Education: Negotiating Change in Today's Schools Edited by Jane Hannaway and Andrew J. Rotherham
| ![]() Why Newsweek's List of America's 100 Best High Schools Doesn't Make the Grade By Andrew J. Rotherham and Sara Mead |
![]() A Qualified Teacher in Every Classroom Edited by Frederick M. Hess, Andrew J. Rotherham, and Kate Walsh |
![]() America's Teaching Crisis By Jason Kamras and Andrew J. Rotherham |
![]() Rethinking Special Education For A New Century Edited by Chester E. Finn, Jr., Andrew J. Rotherham & Charles R. Hokanson, Jr. |
![]() Making The Cut: How States Set Passing Scores on Standardized Tests By Andrew J. Rotherham |
![]() Changing the Game: The Federal Role in Supporting 21st Century Educational Innovation By Andrew J. Rotherham and Sara Mead |
![]() Achieving Teacher and Principal Excellence: A Guidebook for Donors By Andrew J. Rotherham |
Eduwonk is powered by
WordPress | © 2007 - Retrofitted by ArtyBlogs
|
Entries (RSS)
and Comments (RSS).
October 19th, 2009 at 10:13 am
Interesting–to claim that gaining a masters in education is proof of competence in teaching is to ignore the sad reality of schools of education. In many cases a degree–even a masters or even EDD and PhDs–is proof of endurance and ability/willingness to pay for a certificate. When universities lack professionalism and focus on completion rather than quality, it only makes sense that their graduates will reflect that perspective. Arthur Levine’s on target and ignored analysis of schools of ed paints a pretty accurate picture of the institutions that produce many of those questionable degrees. What say we start looking at and regulating those institutions BEFORE they push the products of their degree mills into classrooms, schools, districts, and even DOE???
October 19th, 2009 at 11:07 am
I think the judges words ring true.
“Society would be better served for plaintiffs to ameliorate their scholastic deficiencies, rather than to seek to undermine the standards of a profession most essential to the vitality of a nation’s culture,’’
The degree mills that are out there providing teacher’s with master’s degrees-in many areas of education are a problem-but it is seemingly what the system almost demands-or what the student wants—the requirement of a Master’s degree puts pressure on the student to continue their education in the quickest and easiest way they see-rather than for the extension of their learning.
not ALL school’s of ed are bad, and I believe it is a smaller portion than JSP believes, but, many bad programs are hurting viable schools of education because they have low standards. Online programs, weekend programs in the school, summer programs…alternative routes that do not require any clinical practice…
Schools of Education are highly regulated already!!! A lot more than many other Colleges or disciplines at the University level-State Boards of Education provide significant and prescriptive guidelines to education departments in many states-guidelines that too often hinder excellent, research based teaching.