<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Innovation And Its Discontents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/04/innovation-and-its-discontents.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/04/innovation-and-its-discontents.html</link>
	<description>Education News, Analysis, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:45:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken H</title>
		<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/04/innovation-and-its-discontents.html/comment-page-1#comment-219072</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 02:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eduwonk.com/?p=3904#comment-219072</guid>
		<description>Out here in California, things are pretty much on hold - we&#039;ve already been cut back and if the new budget thing doesn&#039;t go though, things are going to get pretty bad.  Although teachers are still teaching and concerned about education, self-preservation is moving to the forefront - especially in the current us versus them &quot;blame the teachers&quot; climate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out here in California, things are pretty much on hold &#8211; we&#8217;ve already been cut back and if the new budget thing doesn&#8217;t go though, things are going to get pretty bad.  Although teachers are still teaching and concerned about education, self-preservation is moving to the forefront &#8211; especially in the current us versus them &#8220;blame the teachers&#8221; climate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jules</title>
		<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/04/innovation-and-its-discontents.html/comment-page-1#comment-71017</link>
		<dc:creator>Jules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eduwonk.com/?p=3904#comment-71017</guid>
		<description>The Time Magazine article brings up a great point.  The standards which different states hold themselves to are all over the map.  I linked to both this blog and the Time article in my blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Time Magazine article brings up a great point.  The standards which different states hold themselves to are all over the map.  I linked to both this blog and the Time article in my blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra Stotsky</title>
		<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/04/innovation-and-its-discontents.html/comment-page-1#comment-70784</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra Stotsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eduwonk.com/?p=3904#comment-70784</guid>
		<description>Walter Isaacson&#039;s article on national standards rings many alarm bells.   But one that it should have rung is why no one seems to expect the participation of the nation&#039;s mathematicians, or their two professional societies, in the construction of national mathematics standards for K-12.  No other nation would even dream of developing national mathematics standards without a sign-off by the country&#039;s mathematics community.  Perhaps the exclusion of mathematicians from meaningful involvement in the shape and assessment of the K-12 mathematics curriculum is one reason that this country&#039;s children do not do as well on the international scene in mathematics as we would like them to do.  Massachusetts&#039; students&#039; scores in math and science on the 2007 TIMSS suggest that the involvement of mathematicians and scientists in the development of its nationally-recognized mathematics and science standards and assessments made a difference. 

Sandra Stotsky (former senior associate commissioner, Massachusetts Department of Education)
Currently: Professor of Education Reform, University of Arkansas (479 575 7282)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walter Isaacson&#8217;s article on national standards rings many alarm bells.   But one that it should have rung is why no one seems to expect the participation of the nation&#8217;s mathematicians, or their two professional societies, in the construction of national mathematics standards for K-12.  No other nation would even dream of developing national mathematics standards without a sign-off by the country&#8217;s mathematics community.  Perhaps the exclusion of mathematicians from meaningful involvement in the shape and assessment of the K-12 mathematics curriculum is one reason that this country&#8217;s children do not do as well on the international scene in mathematics as we would like them to do.  Massachusetts&#8217; students&#8217; scores in math and science on the 2007 TIMSS suggest that the involvement of mathematicians and scientists in the development of its nationally-recognized mathematics and science standards and assessments made a difference. </p>
<p>Sandra Stotsky (former senior associate commissioner, Massachusetts Department of Education)<br />
Currently: Professor of Education Reform, University of Arkansas (479 575 7282)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Dewey</title>
		<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/04/innovation-and-its-discontents.html/comment-page-1#comment-70672</link>
		<dc:creator>John Dewey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eduwonk.com/?p=3904#comment-70672</guid>
		<description>In Walter Isaacson&#039;s essay on the need for national standards he states: &quot;That&#039;s why it would be useful to have the standards-setting body be advised by recruitment officers from the infotech, biotech, medical and, yes, financial sectors.&quot;

Does he think it might also be useful to have mathematicians from universities involved in the setting of math standards, or does the current edu-fad thinking still prevail that mathematicians know nothing about teaching so leave them out of it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Walter Isaacson&#8217;s essay on the need for national standards he states: &#8220;That&#8217;s why it would be useful to have the standards-setting body be advised by recruitment officers from the infotech, biotech, medical and, yes, financial sectors.&#8221;</p>
<p>Does he think it might also be useful to have mathematicians from universities involved in the setting of math standards, or does the current edu-fad thinking still prevail that mathematicians know nothing about teaching so leave them out of it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

