<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Times Is On My Side?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/03/times-is-on-my-side.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/03/times-is-on-my-side.html</link>
	<description>Education News, Analysis, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:00:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Evers</title>
		<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/03/times-is-on-my-side.html/comment-page-1#comment-64143</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Evers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 05:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eduwonk.com/?p=3860#comment-64143</guid>
		<description>Concerning Sam Dillon&#039;s article in the Sunday New York Times on use of Title I formulas to distribute stimulus plan money --

I have a post on my &#039;Ed Policy&#039; blog

http://ed-policy.blogspot.com/2009/03/they-keep-formulas-in-place-for-reason.html

that discusses:

(1) The important paper by Susan Aud describing ESEA&#039;s Title I spending formulas -- arcane, complicated, and not based on a proven approach

(2) Why Congress keeps the formulas as they are in place.

(3) Does money matter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concerning Sam Dillon&#8217;s article in the Sunday New York Times on use of Title I formulas to distribute stimulus plan money &#8211;</p>
<p>I have a post on my &#8216;Ed Policy&#8217; blog</p>
<p><a href="http://ed-policy.blogspot.com/2009/03/they-keep-formulas-in-place-for-reason.html" rel="nofollow">http://ed-policy.blogspot.com/2009/03/they-keep-formulas-in-place-for-reason.html</a></p>
<p>that discusses:</p>
<p>(1) The important paper by Susan Aud describing ESEA&#8217;s Title I spending formulas &#8212; arcane, complicated, and not based on a proven approach</p>
<p>(2) Why Congress keeps the formulas as they are in place.</p>
<p>(3) Does money matter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

