New Ideas
If you have an idea to improve public education then this should be you next year (pdf).
If you have an idea to improve public education then this should be you next year (pdf).
This entry was posted on Thursday, December 4th, 2008 at 11:17 am. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
"Least influential of education's most influential information sources."
-- Education Week Research Center
"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity... they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Mickey Kaus
"Fabulous"
-- Education Week's Alyson Klein
"a very smart blog... [if] you're trying to separate the demagogic attacks on NCLB from the serious criticism, this is the site to read"
-- Ryan Lizza
"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Hechinger Institute on Education and the Media's Richard Colvin
"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my
high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash of humor"
-- Education Week
"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily
"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly
"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education
"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts
"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin
"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams, fallen journalist, Executive Director, Democrats for Education Reform
"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress, former education advisor to President Bush and former chairman, Dallas Board of
Education
"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner, champion letter-to-the-editor writer and retired teacher
"thugs"
-- Susan Ohanian
2007 Winner, Editor's Choice Best Education Blog
-- Performancing.com
2006 Winner, Best K-12 Administration Blog -- "Best of the Education Blog Awards"
-- eSchool News and Discovery Education
2006 Finalist, Best Education Blog
-- Weblog Awards
![]() Collective Bargaining in Education: Negotiating Change in Today's Schools Edited by Jane Hannaway and Andrew J. Rotherham
| ![]() Better Benefits: Reforming Teacher Pensions for a Changing Work Force By Chad Aldeman and Andrew J. Rotherham |
![]() A Qualified Teacher in Every Classroom Edited by Frederick M. Hess, Andrew J. Rotherham, and Kate Walsh |
![]() Conflicting Missions and Unclear Results: Lessons from the Education Stimulus Funds By Sara Mead, Anand Vaishnav, William Porter, and Andrew J. Rotherham |
![]() Rethinking Special Education For A New Century Edited by Chester E. Finn, Jr., Andrew J. Rotherham & Charles R. Hokanson, Jr. |
![]() Location, Location, Location: How Would a High-Performing Charter School Network Fare in Different States? By Chris Lozier & Andrew J. Rotherham |
![]() Changing the Game: The Federal Role in Supporting 21st Century Educational Innovation By Andrew J. Rotherham and Sara Mead |
![]() Achieving Teacher and Principal Excellence: A Guidebook for Donors By Andrew J. Rotherham |
Eduwonk is powered by
WordPress | © 2007 - Retrofitted by ArtyBlogs
|
Entries (RSS)
and Comments (RSS).
December 5th, 2008 at 10:47 am
Government cannot be entrepreneurial. The Mindless Trust is engaging in self-deception or Orwellian propaganda.
December 6th, 2008 at 7:37 am
I don’t understand this comment–The Mind Trust is a nonprofit, not government. And certainly several education nonprofits (TFA, for example) have proven to be very entrepreneurial (and successful).
December 6th, 2008 at 9:40 am
Government: The Ultimate Anti-Entrpreneur
Eduwonk Reader,
Good question. From the document:
“Organization Will Invest $730,000 in Three Outstanding Social Entrepreneurs to Help Incubate Their Ideas to Transform Public Education in the Nation’s Most Under-Served Communities”
They want to ‘transform public education’. Public means government.
Government, by definition, forces money out of people, puts it where it wants and then extracts more money from the powerless to pay for the damage or success the original outlay caused- it does not matter which as long as the money and power keep rolling in. There is no such thing as profit and loss, investment and entrepreneurship because government does not risk its own capital and pay the price for failure. There is no measure of failure anyway because government is not beholden to the consumer.
Government rent-seeks; it does not invest. Government succeeds when it fails. Most “emergencies”, like education or war or drugs or terrorism or you-name-it, are not only used as excuses to take more money and liberties from people, but are often, indeed, artificial creations of the government and/or government wannabees in the first place.
Public schools are shielded from the market and entrepreneurship. By this protection they naturally produce lesser quality for more cost and suffer from grave internal contradictions. This inevitable consequence gets qualified as an emergency. The current “emergency” produced NCLB and calls for more government power. The consequences, negative from the well-being of children and America in-general, are being used by Obama et al. to induce even further government control. It is a destructive spiral.
So the non-profit, maybe with its heart in the right place, maybe out of ignorance, is merely donating money and mind to what rightly should be called the ultimate anti-entrepreneur.