<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wrapping up the charter naming contest…</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eduwonk.com/2008/08/wrapping-up-the-charter-naming-contest%e2%80%a6.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2008/08/wrapping-up-the-charter-naming-contest%e2%80%a6.html</link>
	<description>Education News, Analysis, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:45:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2008/08/wrapping-up-the-charter-naming-contest%e2%80%a6.html/comment-page-1#comment-4730</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms. Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eduwonk.com/?p=3524#comment-4730</guid>
		<description>Then why not call them &quot;Method&quot; schools? Like Method acting, the term alludes to a strict training regimen requiring absolute commitment from the participant.  

A few years ago, Brooks proposed calling the &quot;thoroughly modern do-gooder&quot; feeder system the &quot;Achievatron.&quot; I love that term because it sounds a little radical, even unnatural--and that, I think, was his point about an attitude he associates with social entrepreneurs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then why not call them &#8220;Method&#8221; schools? Like Method acting, the term alludes to a strict training regimen requiring absolute commitment from the participant.  </p>
<p>A few years ago, Brooks proposed calling the &#8220;thoroughly modern do-gooder&#8221; feeder system the &#8220;Achievatron.&#8221; I love that term because it sounds a little radical, even unnatural&#8211;and that, I think, was his point about an attitude he associates with social entrepreneurs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

