Department of Efficiency

Per the dueling survey issue in New York, it seems the UFT could have just saved themselves a lot of money on their survey and asked just one question about approval/disapproval of Joel Klein. That’s all these questions — that all conspicuously mention his name — are accomplishing and they’re too smart not to know that. Punchline: Klein is not very popular right now. But, we shouldn’t forget the results of the last mayoral election there, which was in part a referendum on the schools.

More serious and longer-term issue, was Joel Klein hired to be popular or effective? The flip side of mayoral control is that it creates an incentive for superintendents to see themselves as only accountable to a constituency of one: The mayor. Why? Because as a practical matter they are. If you look at events in places like Chicago, D.C., New York, etc…you can see the upsides and the downsides of this. It lessens the pressure on leaders to really get out there and persuade and cuts a lot of folks out of the loop. That’s both good and bad and the ensuing politics are pretty obvious.

Posted on Jul 1, 2008 @ 10:10am

One thought on “Department of Efficiency

  1. Anonymous

    Brilliant, as usual! You do realize that the UFT survey was modeled after the NYC learning environment survey, which was an integral part of Klein’s own report card/accountability system. Incidentally, that survey did not contain only one question.

    I imagine they did this quite purposefully, to deflect the usual “union surveys have no credibility” criticism. But they probably should have anticipated that even a sample size of 60,000+ and a survey designed after the city’s own would not be enough to satisfy the angry blame-the-union-for everything crowd.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *