Comments on: When Fordham Attacks http://www.eduwonk.com/2008/03/when-fordham-attacks.html Education News, Analysis, and Commentary Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:45:52 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2 hourly 1 By: marketing http://www.eduwonk.com/2008/03/when-fordham-attacks.html/comment-page-1#comment-738 marketing Thu, 15 May 2008 22:00:00 +0000 http://www.eduwonk.com/wordpress/2008/03/when-fordham-attacks.html#comment-738 www.freakappeal.com http://www.freakappeal.com

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.eduwonk.com/2008/03/when-fordham-attacks.html/comment-page-1#comment-568 Anonymous Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:52:00 +0000 http://www.eduwonk.com/wordpress/2008/03/when-fordham-attacks.html#comment-568 I disagree that they gave Reading First bad name. Obey and the IG did that a year ago. Then Obey kept publicly bad-mouthing it for months, until he finally cut the funding.<br/><br/>Kudos to Fordham that decided finally to stand up to this, and call Obey the bullshitter he is. I disagree that they gave Reading First bad name. Obey and the IG did that a year ago. Then Obey kept publicly bad-mouthing it for months, until he finally cut the funding.

Kudos to Fordham that decided finally to stand up to this, and call Obey the bullshitter he is.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.eduwonk.com/2008/03/when-fordham-attacks.html/comment-page-1#comment-566 Anonymous Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:35:00 +0000 http://www.eduwonk.com/wordpress/2008/03/when-fordham-attacks.html#comment-566 As a strong advocate for Reading First and for the reinstatement of its funding, I was deeply disappointed in Fordham's counter productive, us-vs-them, polarizing activities yesterday. They gave Reading First a bad name and really did a disservice to all the students whom Fordham purports to be supporting. Too bad As a strong advocate for Reading First and for the reinstatement of its funding, I was deeply disappointed in Fordham’s counter productive, us-vs-them, polarizing activities yesterday. They gave Reading First a bad name and really did a disservice to all the students whom Fordham purports to be supporting. Too bad

]]>