<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Meow!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eduwonk.com/2008/01/meow.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2008/01/meow.html</link>
	<description>Education News, Analysis, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:00:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2008/01/meow.html/comment-page-1#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eduwonk.com/wordpress/2008/01/meow.html#comment-281</guid>
		<description>&quot;For starters, its creators unaccountably (and, we think, knowingly, willfully, and politically) ignored the path-breaking work in this field by the National Council on Teacher Quality, including that organization&#039;s superb state teacher policy &quot;yearbook,&quot; which you can find here.&quot; I did not know that superb meant full of factual errors and misrepresentations. I pointed these out to a NCTQ person, but never heard back on any effort to change the errors.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;As the graph shows, the salaries of other professions have a more gradual slope. That&#039;s because there is no, say, National United Computer Programmers union that sets salaries for all the nation&#039;s tech nerds, leaving programmers free to negotiate for salaries based on their individual experience and skills.&quot;  Ummm, last time I checked, the entire south did not have teacher unions. Districts can pay teachers however much they want and in whatever form they want. The only constraint is a state minimum salary schedule that establishes a base pay. Everyone pays more than that in the states I have looked at. C&#039;mon now--if they are going to criticize the QC report--at least get the facts straight in the critique.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;For starters, its creators unaccountably (and, we think, knowingly, willfully, and politically) ignored the path-breaking work in this field by the National Council on Teacher Quality, including that organization&#8217;s superb state teacher policy &#8220;yearbook,&#8221; which you can find here.&#8221; I did not know that superb meant full of factual errors and misrepresentations. I pointed these out to a NCTQ person, but never heard back on any effort to change the errors.</p>
<p>&#8220;As the graph shows, the salaries of other professions have a more gradual slope. That&#8217;s because there is no, say, National United Computer Programmers union that sets salaries for all the nation&#8217;s tech nerds, leaving programmers free to negotiate for salaries based on their individual experience and skills.&#8221;  Ummm, last time I checked, the entire south did not have teacher unions. Districts can pay teachers however much they want and in whatever form they want. The only constraint is a state minimum salary schedule that establishes a base pay. Everyone pays more than that in the states I have looked at. C&#8217;mon now&#8211;if they are going to criticize the QC report&#8211;at least get the facts straight in the critique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

