Meow!
A few people read this as a slight or tried to read things into it. Don’t bother, it was just an interesting question.
A few people read this as a slight or tried to read things into it. Don’t bother, it was just an interesting question.
This, however, is obviously a slight.
This entry was posted on Friday, January 11th, 2008 at 12:48 am. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
"Least influential of education's most influential information sources."
-- Education Week Research Center
"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity... they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Mickey Kaus
"Fabulous"
-- Education Week's Alyson Klein
"a very smart blog... [if] you're trying to separate the demagogic attacks on NCLB from the serious criticism, this is the site to read"
-- Ryan Lizza
"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Hechinger Institute on Education and the Media's Richard Colvin
"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my
high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash of humor"
-- Education Week
"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily
"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly
"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education
"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts
"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin
"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams, fallen journalist, Executive Director, Democrats for Education Reform
"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress, former education advisor to President Bush and former chairman, Dallas Board of
Education
"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner, champion letter-to-the-editor writer and retired teacher
"thugs"
-- Susan Ohanian
2007 Winner, Editor's Choice Best Education Blog
-- Performancing.com
2006 Winner, Best K-12 Administration Blog -- "Best of the Education Blog Awards"
-- eSchool News and Discovery Education
2006 Finalist, Best Education Blog
-- Weblog Awards
![]() Collective Bargaining in Education: Negotiating Change in Today's Schools Edited by Jane Hannaway and Andrew J. Rotherham
| ![]() Better Benefits: Reforming Teacher Pensions for a Changing Work Force By Chad Aldeman and Andrew J. Rotherham |
![]() A Qualified Teacher in Every Classroom Edited by Frederick M. Hess, Andrew J. Rotherham, and Kate Walsh |
![]() Conflicting Missions and Unclear Results: Lessons from the Education Stimulus Funds By Sara Mead, Anand Vaishnav, William Porter, and Andrew J. Rotherham |
![]() Rethinking Special Education For A New Century Edited by Chester E. Finn, Jr., Andrew J. Rotherham & Charles R. Hokanson, Jr. |
![]() Location, Location, Location: How Would a High-Performing Charter School Network Fare in Different States? By Chris Lozier & Andrew J. Rotherham |
![]() Changing the Game: The Federal Role in Supporting 21st Century Educational Innovation By Andrew J. Rotherham and Sara Mead |
![]() Achieving Teacher and Principal Excellence: A Guidebook for Donors By Andrew J. Rotherham |
Eduwonk is powered by
WordPress | © 2007 - Retrofitted by ArtyBlogs
|
Entries (RSS)
and Comments (RSS).
January 11th, 2008 at 12:48 pm
“For starters, its creators unaccountably (and, we think, knowingly, willfully, and politically) ignored the path-breaking work in this field by the National Council on Teacher Quality, including that organization’s superb state teacher policy “yearbook,” which you can find here.” I did not know that superb meant full of factual errors and misrepresentations. I pointed these out to a NCTQ person, but never heard back on any effort to change the errors.
“As the graph shows, the salaries of other professions have a more gradual slope. That’s because there is no, say, National United Computer Programmers union that sets salaries for all the nation’s tech nerds, leaving programmers free to negotiate for salaries based on their individual experience and skills.” Ummm, last time I checked, the entire south did not have teacher unions. Districts can pay teachers however much they want and in whatever form they want. The only constraint is a state minimum salary schedule that establishes a base pay. Everyone pays more than that in the states I have looked at. C’mon now–if they are going to criticize the QC report–at least get the facts straight in the critique.