<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Russell Crowe and the Choice Supply Side Problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eduwonk.com/2007/12/russell-crowe-and-the-choice-supply-side-problem.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2007/12/russell-crowe-and-the-choice-supply-side-problem.html</link>
	<description>Education News, Analysis, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:45:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2007/12/russell-crowe-and-the-choice-supply-side-problem.html/comment-page-1#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eduwonk.com/wordpress/2007/12/russell-crowe-and-the-choice-supply-side-problem.html#comment-214</guid>
		<description>In keeping with your economics theme, there is a flaw, I think, in the Game Theory reasoning of cooperation.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;There are a finite number of students and a finite number of dollars (it may not seem like but there is) for education.  Each group is competing for other scarce resources, including teachers, facilities, and other items.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Cooperation is a great idea and a broad concept of cooperation is possible, sort of like a trade association for choice schools, but cooperation to improve market share is only going to cause problems later on and can&#039;t really work in an economic sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In keeping with your economics theme, there is a flaw, I think, in the Game Theory reasoning of cooperation.  </p>
<p>There are a finite number of students and a finite number of dollars (it may not seem like but there is) for education.  Each group is competing for other scarce resources, including teachers, facilities, and other items.  </p>
<p>Cooperation is a great idea and a broad concept of cooperation is possible, sort of like a trade association for choice schools, but cooperation to improve market share is only going to cause problems later on and can&#8217;t really work in an economic sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2007/12/russell-crowe-and-the-choice-supply-side-problem.html/comment-page-1#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eduwonk.com/wordpress/2007/12/russell-crowe-and-the-choice-supply-side-problem.html#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Is it bad for charters to be associated with private school ideas like Catholic schools or vouchers?  Wouldn&#039;t that just make more people think charter schools are not public schools when in fact they are public?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it bad for charters to be associated with private school ideas like Catholic schools or vouchers?  Wouldn&#8217;t that just make more people think charter schools are not public schools when in fact they are public?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Double H</title>
		<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2007/12/russell-crowe-and-the-choice-supply-side-problem.html/comment-page-1#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Double H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eduwonk.com/wordpress/2007/12/russell-crowe-and-the-choice-supply-side-problem.html#comment-190</guid>
		<description>GGW is definitely wild! But I think your point here about cooperation within the choice sector is a great compliment to the portfolio model being attempted by large urban districts such as NYC, Philly, and now NOLA. I would expand your suggestions to include districts as potential cooperators/collaborators. In the current context for urbans, no one provider can do it all. Districts have to become more savvy about collaborating with other in-school and  out-of-school providers. Check out the Annenberg Institute&#039;s Smart Education Systems (http://www.annenberginstitute.org/Idea/index.php) new (old) idea that calls for cross-sector partnerships that upset the status quo and help catapult student achievement beyond proficiency towards excellence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GGW is definitely wild! But I think your point here about cooperation within the choice sector is a great compliment to the portfolio model being attempted by large urban districts such as NYC, Philly, and now NOLA. I would expand your suggestions to include districts as potential cooperators/collaborators. In the current context for urbans, no one provider can do it all. Districts have to become more savvy about collaborating with other in-school and  out-of-school providers. Check out the Annenberg Institute&#8217;s Smart Education Systems (<a href="http://www.annenberginstitute.org/Idea/index.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.annenberginstitute.org/Idea/index.php</a>) new (old) idea that calls for cross-sector partnerships that upset the status quo and help catapult student achievement beyond proficiency towards excellence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

