Start The Séance
Per the post below, see also this NYT story. Kahlenberg, duty calls!
Per the post below, see also this NYT story. Kahlenberg, duty calls!
This entry was posted on Thursday, November 15th, 2007 at 10:24 am. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
2007 Winner, Editor's Choice Best Education Blog
-- Performancing.com
2006 Winner, Best K-12 Administration Blog -- "Best of the Education Blog Awards"
-- eSchool News and Discovery Education
2006 Finalist, Best Education Blog
-- Weblog Awards
Least influential of education's most influential information sources.
-- Education
Week Research Center
"unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity...
they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!"
-- Slate's Mickey Kaus
"a very smart blog... [if] you're trying to separate the demagogic attacks on NCLB from the serious
criticism, this is the site to read"
-- The New Republic's Ryan Lizza
"everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk"
-- Hechinger Institute on Education and the Media's Richard Colvin
"full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my
high school rating system"
-- Jay Mathews, The Washington Post
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash
of humor"
-- Education Week
"designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the
liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools"
-- The New Dem Daily
"peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day"
-- Education Gadfly
"don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good"
-- Alexander Russo, This Week In Education
"the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere"
-- Mike Antonucci, Intercepts
"…the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck…"
-- Michele McLaughlin, AFT Blog
"I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine"
-- Joe Williams, fallen journalist, Executive Director, Democrats for Education Reform
"...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts"
-- Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
"I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk"
-- Sandy Kress, former education advisor to President Bush and former chairman, Dallas Board of
Education
"penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues"
-- Walt Gardner, champion letter-to-the-editor writer and retired teacher
"thugs"
-- Susan Ohanian
![]() Collective Bargaining in Education: Negotiating Change in Today's Schools Edited by Jane Hannaway and Andrew J. Rotherham
| ![]() Why Newsweek's List of America's 100 Best High Schools Doesn't Make the Grade By Andrew J. Rotherham and Sara Mead |
![]() A Qualified Teacher in Every Classroom Edited by Frederick M. Hess, Andrew J. Rotherham, and Kate Walsh |
![]() America's Teaching Crisis By Jason Kamras and Andrew J. Rotherham |
![]() Rethinking Special Education For A New Century Edited by Chester E. Finn, Jr., Andrew J. Rotherham & Charles R. Hokanson, Jr. |
![]() Making The Cut: How States Set Passing Scores on Standardized Tests By Andrew J. Rotherham |
Eduwonk is powered by
WordPress | © 2007 - Retrofitted by ArtyBlogs
|
Entries (RSS)
and Comments (RSS).
November 15th, 2007 at 12:54 pm
But what will constitute “supporting evidence” for termination under this model? I can’t imagine five consultants will be enough to handle the case load. The case itself is often suspect, because it might not include admissible evidence under the current UFT contract.
Right now there’s little oversight to ensure schools follow UFT protocol. When my school administration threatened incompetence charges (I was an untenured first-year Teach for America corps member), my school union rep directed me to consult the UFT handbook myself and call the regional office, which never followed up. Three TFA teachers from my school were under similar investigation, all having passed multiple formal evaluations, for reasons never made clear to us nor to TFA. Two other new teachers were as well, as were five or six tenured teachers. (The school followed through in one tenure case–too much paperwork, an assistant principal said.)
The cases against these teachers supposedly included phone transcripts and memos to which we were not allowed access (the UFT says teachers can request access to this documentation once charges are filed), rated “informal evaluations” (only pre-scheduled formal observations may be rated), narratives of off-the-record conversations conducted without union representation (regional disciplinary hearings require transcripts of on-the-record discussions, and sometimes supporting audio), not to mention unsubstantiated allegations from students known to have fabricated accusations against faculty in the past. If that’s what it takes to remove pre-screened TFA teachers, I can’t imagine the legwork such a school might pursue to remove an underperforming tenured teacher.
While I understand the drive to remove poor performers, there needs to be a much harder look at how underperformance is assessed in the city–is it a measure of classroom management? student scores? professionalism?