<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Method Madness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eduwonk.com/2007/11/method-madness.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2007/11/method-madness.html</link>
	<description>Education News, Analysis, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:00:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2007/11/method-madness.html/comment-page-1#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eduwonk.com/wordpress/2007/11/method-madness.html#comment-178</guid>
		<description>FYI, there is a now an amendment attached to the HEA reauthorization that cancels both the Upward Bound evaluation and the Absolute Priority that justifies it, AND says &quot;The Secretary shall not require an eligible entity desiring to receive assistance under this chapter to recruit students to serve as a control group for purposes of evaluating any program or project assisted under this chapter.&quot; Very disturbing precedent!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, there is a now an amendment attached to the HEA reauthorization that cancels both the Upward Bound evaluation and the Absolute Priority that justifies it, AND says &#8220;The Secretary shall not require an eligible entity desiring to receive assistance under this chapter to recruit students to serve as a control group for purposes of evaluating any program or project assisted under this chapter.&#8221; Very disturbing precedent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: age group mom</title>
		<link>http://www.eduwonk.com/2007/11/method-madness.html/comment-page-1#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>age group mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eduwonk.com/wordpress/2007/11/method-madness.html#comment-130</guid>
		<description>No, not optimal design. Researchers should use the most valid design. The design with the most scientific power to reveal program effects. It shouldn&#039;t even be up for debate, actually.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Randomized trials are the most powerful research design. Followed by observational studies that use methods such as propensity modeling to improve the chance to for causal claims. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This is not some arbitrary conclusion that Congress can change with a wave of a wand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, not optimal design. Researchers should use the most valid design. The design with the most scientific power to reveal program effects. It shouldn&#8217;t even be up for debate, actually.</p>
<p>Randomized trials are the most powerful research design. Followed by observational studies that use methods such as propensity modeling to improve the chance to for causal claims. </p>
<p>This is not some arbitrary conclusion that Congress can change with a wave of a wand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

